Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Shiqiang FuThe Key Laboratory of Polymer Processing Engineering of Ministry of Education, National, Engineering Research Center of Novel Equipment for Polymer Processing, Guangdong, Provincial Key Laboratory of Technique and Equipment for Macromolecular Advanced, Manufacturing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Hongwu WuThe Key Laboratory of Polymer Processing Engineering of Ministry of Education, National, Engineering Research Center of Novel Equipment for Polymer Processing, Guangdong, Provincial Key Laboratory of Technique and Equipment for Macromolecular Advanced, Manufacturing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0126-9012
Kang ZhuThe Key Laboratory of Polymer Processing Engineering of Ministry of Education, National, Engineering Research Center of Novel Equipment for Polymer Processing, Guangdong, Provincial Key Laboratory of Technique and Equipment for Macromolecular Advanced, Manufacturing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Zhouxiang ZhaoThe Key Laboratory of Polymer Processing Engineering of Ministry of Education, National, Engineering Research Center of Novel Equipment for Polymer Processing, Guangdong, Provincial Key Laboratory of Technique and Equipment for Macromolecular Advanced, Manufacturing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Zhifang LiangThe Key Laboratory of Polymer Processing Engineering of Ministry of Education, National, Engineering Research Center of Novel Equipment for Polymer Processing, Guangdong, Provincial Key Laboratory of Technique and Equipment for Macromolecular Advanced, Manufacturing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
South China University of Technology · CN
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The present work explored alkali-treated coconut petiole fibers (ACPFs) characterization and the effect of fiber loadings on the mechanical properties of poly (lactic acid) (PLA)/ACPF composites for the first time. The physical, mechanical, and interfacial properties, as well as the morphology of the ACPFs were reported. It was found that ACPFs with a density of 0.92 g/cm
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The Unique Morphology of Coconut Petiole Fibers Facilitates the Fabrication of Plant Composites with High Impact Performance. · full record | OpenQuestion