Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37177316›Full record

ReviewPolymers2023

Description of Poly(aryl-ether-ketone) Materials (PAEKs), Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) for Application as a Dental Material: A Materials Science Review.

Syazwani Mohamad Zol, Muhammad Syafiq Alauddin, Zulfahmi Said, Mohd Ifwat Mohd Ghazali, Lee Hao-Ern, Durratul Aqwa Mohd Farid, Nur A'fifah Husna Zahari, Aws Hashim Ali Al-Khadim, Azrul Hafiz Abdul Aziz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical and Prosthetic Outcomes of Titanium Zirconium Versus PEEK Composite Maxillary Fixed Prostheses Opposing Distal Extension Partial Dentures: Comparative Clinical Study.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Syazwani Mohamad ZolFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia.
Muhammad Syafiq AlauddinDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia.
Zulfahmi SaidDepartment of Basic Sciences and Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia.
Mohd Ifwat Mohd GhazaliSMART RG, Faculty of Science and Technology (FST), Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Nilai 71800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9232-7278
Lee Hao-ErnFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia.
Durratul Aqwa Mohd FaridFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia.
Nur A'fifah Husna ZahariFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia.
Aws Hashim Ali Al-KhadimDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia.
Azrul Hafiz Abdul AzizDepartment of Paediatrics Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia.

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education FRGS/1/2021/STG05/USIM/03/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly(aryl-ether-ketone) materials (PAEKs), a class of high-performance polymers comprised of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), have attracted interest in standard dental procedures due to their inherent characteristics in terms of mechanical and biological properties. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a restorative dental material widely used for prosthetic frameworks due to its superior physical, mechanical, aesthetic, and handling features. Meanwhile, polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) is a semi-crystalline thermoplastic embraced in the additive manufacturing market. In the present review study, a new way to fabricate high-performance polymers, particularly PEEK and PEKK, is demonstrated using additive manufacturing digital dental technology, or 3-dimensional (3D) printing. The focus in this literature review will encompass an investigation of the chemical, mechanical, and biological properties of HPPs, particularly PEEK and PEKK, along with their application particularly in dentistry. High-performance polymers have gained popularity in denture prosthesis in advance dentistry due to their flexibility in terms of manufacturing and the growing interest in utilizing additive manufacturing in denture fabrication. Further, this review also explores the literature regarding the properties of high-performance polymers (HPP) compared to previous reported polymers in terms of the dental material along with the current advancement of the digital designing and manufacturing.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingdental materialsdentistryhigh-performance polymer (HPP)polyetheretherketone (PEEK)polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)

Identifiers

PMID37177316
PMCPMC10180673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.