Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37177167›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder.

Antoni Pagés-Llobet, Francesc X Espinach, Fernando Julián, Helena Oliver-Ortega, José Alberto Méndez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antoni Pagés-LlobetLEPAMAP-PRODIS Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Agriculture and Food Technology, Universitat de Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-9373
Francesc X EspinachLEPAMAP-PRODIS Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Agriculture and Food Technology, Universitat de Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6635-0260
Fernando JuliánLEPAMAP-PRODIS Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Agriculture and Food Technology, Universitat de Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3230-0588
Helena Oliver-OrtegaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Colom 1, 08222 Terrassa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9398-8112
José Alberto MéndezLEPAMAP-PRODIS Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Agriculture and Food Technology, Universitat de Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0417-8431

Funding

Ministerio de Ciéncia, Innovación y Universidades - MCIU from Spanish Goverment PID2020-117802RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) is one of the most used and industrially applied additive manufacturing processes due to its fast prototyping and manufacturing, simplicity, and low cost of the equipment. However, the mechanical properties of the printed products have a large dependence on orientation and interface strength between layers which is mainly related to the thermal union obtained. This thermal union has a large dependence on the melting and cooling down process. Additionally, the materials used must be extruded in a continuous filament before their use, which limits the materials used. However, a pellet extruder could be used directly in the printing equipment, avoiding filament extrusion. In this work, specimens of PLA (Poly(lactic acid)) with different bead orientations have been produced via filament or pellet extrusion to compare the effect of the different melting processes in the manufacturing methodology. Pellet extruded specimens showed higher infill and mechanical properties. These results were related to better adhesion between layers due to the longer melting and cooling process. The result was confirmed using DSC and XRD techniques, where a higher crystallinity was observed. A bicomponent specimen (50% pellet-50% filament) was prepared and tested, showing higher mechanical results than expected, which was, again, due to the better thermal union obtained in the pellet extruder.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingcristallinityFDM (Fused Deposition Modeling)interfacemechanical propertiesPoly(lactic acid)

Identifiers

PMID37177167
PMCPMC10180944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.