ArticlePolymers2023
Influence of Crosslinking Methods on Biomimetically Mineralized Collagen Matrices for Bone-like Biomaterials.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amino Acid Metabolism in Health and Disease.MedComm · 2026Review
- Article
- Recent advances in biomaterials for bone regeneration: Bridging innovation and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Multiscale Design of Dental Restorative Materials: Mechanistic Foundations, Technological Innovations, and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Dynamic-Cross-Linked, Regulated, and Controllable Mineralization Degree and Morphology of Collagen Biomineralization.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- The Influence of Various Crosslinking Conditions of EDC/NHS on the Properties of Fish Collagen Film.Marine drugs · 2024Article
- Potential of Heparan Sulphate Mimetics Integrated Into Collagen Scaffolds for Enhanced Skin Wound Healing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To assist in bone defect repair, ideal bone regeneration scaffolds should exhibit good osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity, but for load-bearing applications, they should also have mechanical properties that emulate those of native bone. The use of biomimetic processing methods for the mineralization of collagen fibrils has resulted in interpenetrating composites that mimic the nanostructure of native bone; however, closely matching the mechanical properties of bone on a larger scale is something that is still yet to be achieved. In this study, four different collagen crosslinking methods (EDC-NHS, quercetin, methacrylated collagen, and riboflavin) are compared and combined with biomimetic mineralization via the polymer-induced liquid-precursor (PILP) process, to obtain bone-like collagen-hydroxyapatite composites. Densified fibrillar collagen scaffolds were fabricated, crosslinked, and biomimetically mineralized using the PILP process, and the effect of each crosslinking method on the degree of mineralization, tensile strength, and modulus of the mineralized scaffolds were analyzed and compared. Improved modulus and tensile strength values were obtained using EDC-NHS and riboflavin crosslinking methods, while quercetin and methacrylated collagen resulted in little to no increase in mechanical properties. Decreased mineral contents appear to be necessary for retaining tensile strength, suggesting that mineral content should be kept below a percolation threshold to optimize properties of these interpenetrating nanocomposites. This work supports the premise that a combination of collagen crosslinking and biomimetic mineralization methods may provide solutions for fabricating robust bone-like composites on a larger scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.