Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37176925›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

FF-Net: Feature-Fusion-Based Network for Semantic Segmentation of 3D Plant Point Cloud.

Xindong Guo, Yu Sun, Hua Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xindong GuoCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.ORCID 0009-0000-1425-1415
Yu SunCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Hua YangCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province 202203021222175Scientific and Technologial Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi 2022L086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds has played an important role in the field of plant phenotyping in recent years. However, existing methods need to down-sample the point cloud to a relatively small size when processing large-scale plant point clouds, which contain more than hundreds of thousands of points, which fails to take full advantage of the high-resolution of advanced scanning devices. To address this issue, we propose a feature-fusion-based method called FF-Net, which consists of two branches, namely the voxel-branch and the point-branch. In particular, the voxel-branch partitions a point cloud into voxels and then employs sparse 3D convolution to learn the context features, and the point-branch learns the point features within a voxel to preserve the detailed point information. Finally, an attention-based module was designed to fuse the two branch features to produce the final segmentation. We conducted extensive experiments on two large plant point clouds (maize and tomato), and the results showed that our method outperformed three commonly used models on both datasets and achieved the best mIoU of 80.95% on the maize dataset and 86.65% on the tomato dataset. Extensive cross-validation experiments were performed to evaluate the generalization ability of the models, and our method achieved promising segmentation results. In addition, the drawbacks of the proposed method were analyzed, and the directions for future works are given.

Indexed as

feature fusionplant phenotypepoint cloudsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID37176925
PMCPMC10181320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.