Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Yongjian LuoHubei Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3788-524X
Yixin ZhangAgro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Yu JiangHubei Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Zhangyan DaiAgro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Qing LiAgro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Jiaolin MouHubei Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Li XuHubei Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Shiming DengHubei Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Jitao LiHubei Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Ru WangHubei Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Jun LiuAgro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5450-4827
Zhijun DengHubei Key Laboratory of Biologic Resources Protection and Utilization, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Minzu University of China · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN
Funding
Foundation of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences 202132TDNational Natural Science Foundation of China 31860073,31871716The Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province, China 2022B0202110003,2020B121201008, 2019KJ106
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
DEPgerminationHSPLEAorthodox seedsreactive oxygen species (ROS)
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
iTRAQ-Based Proteomic and Physiological Analyses Reveal the Mechanisms of Dehydration and Cryopreservation Tolerance of · full record | OpenQuestion