ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Role of Lung Ultrasound in the Follow-Up of Children with Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Case-Control Assessment of Children with Long COVID or Fully Recovered.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated with Long COVID in the Pediatric Population: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review Protocol of Lung Ultrasound in Pediatric COVID-19: Clinical Utility and Lessons for Future Pandemics.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Lung Ultrasound After COVID-19: A Pivotal Moment for Clinical Integration-Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of Omicron infection on childhood health: the Beijing long-COVID study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Role of Lung Ultrasound in the Detection of Lung Sequelae in Post-COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Lung ultrasound among Expert operator'S: ScOring and iNter-rater reliability analysis (LESSON study) a secondary COWS study analysis from ITALUS group.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024Article
- COVID-19 Pediatric Follow-Up: Respiratory Long COVID-Associated Comorbidities and Lung Ultrasound Alterations in a Cohort of Italian Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) can detect lower respiratory tract involvement in children with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, its role in follow-up assessments is still unclear. To describe LUS findings in children after SARS-CoV-2 infection, we conducted a prospective study in a population of pediatric patients referred to the post-COVID unit in a tertiary center during the study period from February 2021 to May 2022. Children were classified as recovered from acute infection or with persisting symptoms. LUS was performed in all children and a LUS score (ranging from 0 to 36 points) was calculated according to the Italian Academy of Thoracic Ultrasound. Six hundred forty-seven children (304 females, 47%) were enrolled. The median follow-up evaluation was two months. The median age was 7.9 (IQR: 6) years. At the follow-up evaluation, 251 patients (38.8%) had persistent symptoms, of whom 104 (16.1%) had at least one respiratory symptom. The median LUS level was 2 (IQR: 4). LUS findings and LUS scores did not differ in children with Long COVID compared to the group of children fully recovered from the initial infection. In conclusion, after SARS-CoV-2 infection, LUS was mostly normal or showed minimal artifacts in all groups of children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.