ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing over His Bundle Pacing: How Far Have We Come?
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apex vs. Septum Pacing: A Comprehensive Review of Pacemaker Implantation Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Riding the Highs and Lows of the Conduction System Pacing Wave-Our Experience.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Arrhythmic Risk Stratification in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Review of the Current Literature.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Contemporary Advances in Cardiac Remote Monitoring: A Comprehensive, Updated Mini-Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Is Conduction System Pacing a Valuable Alternative to Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Long-Term Performance of Epicardial versus Transvenous Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implantable cardiac pacemakers have greatly evolved during the few past years, focusing on newer modalities of physiologic cardiac pacing [...].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.