Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37176654›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Investigating the Effectiveness of a Family Intervention after Acquired Brain or Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pernille Langer Soendergaard, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Mia Moth Wolffbrandt, Frederik Lehman Dornonville de la Cour, Fin Biering-Sørensen, Anne Norup

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pernille Langer SoendergaardNeurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5347-8898
Juan Carlos Arango-LasprillaDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7184-8311
Mia Moth WolffbrandtNeurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.
Frederik Lehman Dornonville de la CourNeurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2905-557X
Fin Biering-SørensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne NorupNeurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Oestifterne j.nr. 18-077The Council of Danish Victims Fund grant 18-610-00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Acquired brain injury (ABI) or spinal cord injury (SCI) constitutes a severe life change for the entire family, often resulting in decreased quality of life (QoL) and increased caregiver burden. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a family intervention in individuals with ABI or SCI and in their family members. (2) Methods: An RCT of a family intervention group (FIG) vs. a psychoeducational group (PEG) (ratio 1:1) was performed. The FIG received an eight-week manual-based family intervention, and the PEG received one psychoeducational session. Self-reported questionnaires on QoL with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and on caregiver burden with the Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS) were the primary outcomes. The data analysis involved linear mixed-effects regression models. (3) Results: In total, 74 participants were allocated randomly to the FIG and 84 were allocated randomly to the PEG. The FIG had significantly larger improvements on the MCS and significantly larger reductions on the CBS at the two-month follow-up than participants in the PEG (mean differences of 5.64 points on the MCS and -0.26 points on the CBS). At the eight-month follow-up, the between-group difference remained significant (mean difference of 4.59 points) on the MCS, whereas that on the CBS was borderline significant (mean change of -0.14 points). (4) Conclusions: Family intervention was superior to psychoeducation, with larger improvements in QoL and larger reductions in caregiver burden.

Indexed as

acquired brain injurycaregivercaregiver burdenfamily interventionindividual with injuryquality of liferandomized controlled trialspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID37176654
PMCPMC10179666
OpenAlexW4367598792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.