ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Cardiometabolic Effects of Cabergoline and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in Young Women with Hyperprolactinemia: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiometabolic Aspects of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia.Endocrine reviews · 2025Review
- The Course of Minipuberty in Daughters of Women with Low Gestational Vitamin D Status.Nutrients · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although dopaminergic agents are the drugs of choice in treatment of prolactin excess, women who cannot be treated with these agents are recommended to receive estrogen preparations. The aim of this study was to compare cardiometabolic effects of both treatment options. The study population included three groups of young women. Subjects with mild-to-moderate hyperprolactinemia received either low-dose cabergoline or oral combined contraceptives (ethinyl estradiol plus desogestrel), while normoprolactinemic women were drug-naive. Plasma prolactin, glucose homeostasis markers, lipids, circulating levels of uric acid, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fibrinogen and homocysteine, and the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) were assessed at entry and six months later. Hyperprolactinemic women differed from normoprolactinemic ones in glucose homeostasis markers, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, hsCRP, fibrinogen, homocysteine and UACR. Cabergoline decreased total and monomeric prolactin levels, which was accompanied by normalization of glucose, insulin sensitivity, glycated hemoglobin, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, hsCRP, fibrinogen, homocysteine and UACR. Despite a neutral effect on prolactin levels, combined contraceptives worsened insulin sensitivity and increased triglycerides, hsCRP, fibrinogen and UACR. At follow-up, cabergoline-treated women were characterized by a better cardiometabolic profile than women receiving ethinyl estradiol plus desogestrel. Our findings suggest that only cabergoline reduces cardiometabolic risk in young women with hyperprolactinemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.