ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Risk Factors and Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Wound Infections after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nasopharyngeal Methicillin-Resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> Carriage and Risk of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy-Related Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Digestive Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Bacterial Pathogens, Host Susceptibility, and the Impact of Viral Hepatitis.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY
aimThe incidence of wound infections after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) varies widely in recent studies. The present study systematically investigates the underlying risk factors for the development of wound infections in a large cohort of patients over a long-term follow-up period. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing PEG insertion using either the pull or push technique was conducted and patients followed up for 3 years. Tube-related wound infections were identified, and pathogens regularly cultured from wound swabs. Adjusted analysis was performed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
results616 patients were included in this study. A total of 25% percent of patients developed wound infections upon PEG tube insertion and 6.5% showed recurrent infections. Nicotine abuse (
conclusionsWound infections after PEG placement are common and occasionally occur as recurrent infections. There is potential for improvement in everyday clinical practice, particularly regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in accordance with guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.