ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Supine MDS-UPDRS-III Assessment: An Explorative Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative quantification of MDS-UPDRS-III tremor measurements in patients with Parkinson's disease using accelerometry.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Reassessing Machine Learning Conclusions for Parkinson's Fall Prediction.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Subthalamic Local Field Potential Monitoring in Parkinson's Disease during Epidural Electric Spinal Cord Stimulation.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Validation and application of computer vision algorithms for video-based tremor analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Objective clinical registration of tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity during awake stereotactic neurosurgery: a scoping review.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Associating frailty and dynamic dysregulation between motor and cardiac autonomic systems.Frontiers in aging · 2024Article
- Inter-rater reliability of hand motor function assessment in Parkinson's disease: Impact of clinician training.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2024Article
- The Relevance of Intraoperative Clinical and Accelerometric Measurements for Thalamotomy Outcome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A Novel Accelerometry Method to Perioperatively Quantify Essential Tremor Based on Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Criteria.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) is designed to be applied in the sitting position. However, to evaluate the clinical effect during stereotactic neurosurgery or to assess bedridden patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the MDS-UPDRS-III is often used in a supine position. This explorative study evaluates the agreement of the MDS-UPDRS-III in the sitting and the supine positions. In 23 PD patients, the MDS-UPDRS-III was applied in both positions while accelerometric measurements were performed. Video recordings of the assessments were evaluated by two certified raters. Agreement between the sitting and supine MDS-UPDRS-III was studied using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Relationships between the MDS-UPDRS-III tremor scores and accelerometric amplitudes were calculated for both positions with linear regression. A fair to substantial agreement was found for MDS-UPDRS-III scores of individual items in the sitting and supine positions, while combining all tests resulted in a substantial agreement. The inter-rater reliability was fair to moderate for both positions. A logarithmic relationship between tremor scores and accelerometric amplitude was revealed for both the sitting and supine positions. Nevertheless, these data are insufficient to fully support the supine application of the MDS-UPDRS-III. Several recommendations are made to address the sensitivity of the scale to inter-rater variability. In conclusion, although an overall substantial agreement between sitting and supine MDS-UPDRS-III is confirmed, its application in the supine position is not endorsed for the whole range of its individual items. Caution is warranted in interpreting the supine MDS-UPDRS-III, pending additional research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.