Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37176549›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Supine MDS-UPDRS-III Assessment: An Explorative Study.

Naomi I Kremer, Annemarie Smid, Stèfan F Lange, Iara Mateus Marçal, Katalin Tamasi, J Marc C van Dijk, Teus van Laar, Gea Drost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naomi I KremerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7818-0318
Annemarie SmidDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-4676
Stèfan F LangeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Iara Mateus MarçalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Katalin TamasiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9391-4597
J Marc C van DijkDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-5680
Teus van LaarExpertise Center Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gea DrostDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3546-4548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) is designed to be applied in the sitting position. However, to evaluate the clinical effect during stereotactic neurosurgery or to assess bedridden patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the MDS-UPDRS-III is often used in a supine position. This explorative study evaluates the agreement of the MDS-UPDRS-III in the sitting and the supine positions. In 23 PD patients, the MDS-UPDRS-III was applied in both positions while accelerometric measurements were performed. Video recordings of the assessments were evaluated by two certified raters. Agreement between the sitting and supine MDS-UPDRS-III was studied using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Relationships between the MDS-UPDRS-III tremor scores and accelerometric amplitudes were calculated for both positions with linear regression. A fair to substantial agreement was found for MDS-UPDRS-III scores of individual items in the sitting and supine positions, while combining all tests resulted in a substantial agreement. The inter-rater reliability was fair to moderate for both positions. A logarithmic relationship between tremor scores and accelerometric amplitude was revealed for both the sitting and supine positions. Nevertheless, these data are insufficient to fully support the supine application of the MDS-UPDRS-III. Several recommendations are made to address the sensitivity of the scale to inter-rater variability. In conclusion, although an overall substantial agreement between sitting and supine MDS-UPDRS-III is confirmed, its application in the supine position is not endorsed for the whole range of its individual items. Caution is warranted in interpreting the supine MDS-UPDRS-III, pending additional research.

Indexed as

accelerometryMDS-UPDRSmotor sectionsupinevalidation

Identifiers

PMID37176549
PMCPMC10179103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.