ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
NT-proBNP Is a Predictor of Mortality in Adults with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Heart-Lung Axis: A Review of the Crosstalk Between the Hemodynamic, Neurohormonal, and Immune Systems in Pulmonary Hypertension.Comprehensive physiology · 2026Review
- Natriuretic Peptides as Multisystem Regulators: From Clinical Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets in Cardio-immunology.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluating NT-proBNP-to-Albumin (NTAR) and RDW-to-eGFR (RGR) Ratios as Biomarkers for Predicting Hospitalization Duration and Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting Outcome in Adult Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Predictive Value of NT-proBNP and High-Sensitive Troponin T.International journal of vascular medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Still Room for Improvement.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbout 5-10% of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) will develop pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), which is associated with significant mortality. Studies on risk factors for poor outcome in a contemporary cohort of these patients with PAH associated with CHD (PAH-CHD) are rare.
methodsIn this retrospective, single-center study, adult patients with the diagnosis PAH-CHD who had at least one contact as an outpatient or inpatient at the German Heart Centre Munich during the period January 2010-September 2019 were included. Patients with PAH without a CHD were excluded. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
resultsAltogether, 158 patients (mean age 39.9 ± 15.4 years, female 64.6%) were included in the study. A pre-tricuspid shunt was present in 17.7%, other shunts in 51.3%, PAH associated with complex CHD in 22.8%, and segmental PAH in 8.2%. An NT-proBNP measurement at baseline was available in 95 patients (60.1%). During a median follow-up of 5.37 years [IQR 1.76-8.63], the primary endpoint occurred in 10 patients (6.7%). On univariate analysis, CRP (log) (HR 3.35, 95% CI (1.07-10.48),
conclusionNT-proBNP is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in a contemporary cohort of PAH-CHD patients. The role of CRP and uric acid should be further assessed in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.