ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Long-Term In Vitro Adhesive Properties of Two Universal Adhesives to Dentin.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of universal adhesives used in different etching modes on dentin bond strength: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical evaluation of different solvent type and HEMA-content of universal adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions: a two-year double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Effects of desensitizing treatments on acid-etched dentin: debris precipitation, bond strength and tag formation.Odontology · 2026Article
- Effect of Etching Protocols on the Bonding Performance of a HEMA-Free Two-Step Universal Adhesive to Caries-Affected Dentin.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of cuspal deflection and microleakage of an incrementally packed versus a low shrinkage bulk-fill nanohybrid resin composite: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of Etching Mode on the Dentin Bond Durability of Universal Adhesives.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of customized bioactive glass in experimental composites on dentin bond strength after 12 months of aging.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Article
- Influence of Academic Training and Professional Experience on the Management of Deep Caries Lesions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Dentin Bonding Durability of Four Different Recently Introduced Self-Etch Adhesives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of Simulated Dental Pulpal Pressure Using Fetal Bovine Serum for the Bonding Performance of Contemporary Adhesive to Dentin.Polymers · 2024Article
- Comparison of Adhesion Performance of a Self-curing and a Light-curing Universal Adhesive to Various Dental Substrates and CAD/CAM Materials.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2024Article
- Comparative Study on Interface Fracture of 4th Generation 3-Steps Adhesive and 7th Generation Universal Adhesive.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Classification and Selection of Adhesive Agents; an Overview for the General Dentist.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The composition of universal adhesives, as well as the adhesive strategy, may influence bonding effectiveness and durability. This study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and nanoleakage (NL), immediately and after 6-month aging, and in situ degree of conversion (DC), of two universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SBU; Xeno Select, XEN) applied with etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) strategies, in comparison with a two-step SE adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, CSE). Dentin surfaces of fifty human third molars were randomly assigned to the following adhesives: two universal adhesives, SBU and XEN, applied in ER or SE mode and CSE, used as control. Teeth were sectioned into beams to be tested under µTBS, half of them after 24 h, and the rest after 6 months of water aging. Selected beams from each tooth were used for NL evaluation and in situ DC quantification. SBU and CSE showed significantly higher mean µTBS and lower nanoleakage than XEN, regardless of the evaluation time and adhesion strategy. XEN-SE yielded the lowest degree of conversion. Therefore, adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin are material dependent, regardless of the adhesion strategy, exhibiting XEN a significantly worse performance than SBU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.