Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37176102›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Clinical and Translational Applications of Serological and Histopathological Biomarkers in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

Leonel Pekarek, Alicia Sánchez Cendra, Eduardo D Roberts Cervantes, Cristina Sánchez Cendra, Oscar Fraile-Martinez, Cielo García-Montero, Raul Diaz-Pedrero, Diego Torres-Carranza, Laura Lopez-Gonzalez, Soledad Aguado-Henche and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting miRNAs in renal cell carcinoma: emerging therapeutic strategies.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Circulating CD3Cancer medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonel PekarekDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-9003
Alicia Sánchez CendraOncology Service, Guadalajara University Hospital, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain.
Eduardo D Roberts CervantesOncology Service, Guadalajara University Hospital, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain.
Cristina Sánchez CendraOncology Service, Guadalajara University Hospital, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain.
Oscar Fraile-MartinezDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4494-6397
Cielo García-MonteroDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6016-7855
Raul Diaz-PedreroRamón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Diego Torres-CarranzaDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.
Laura Lopez-GonzalezDepartment of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.
Soledad Aguado-HencheDepartment of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.
Antonio Rios-ParraDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.
Luis M García-PuenteDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.
Natalio García-HonduvillaDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0904-6198
Julia BujanDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2419-2476
Melchor Alvarez-MonDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1309-7510
Miguel A SaezDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8389-258X
Miguel A OrtegaDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2588-1708
Universidad de Alcalá · ESHospital Universitario de Guadalajara · ES

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid MITIC-CM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and the most common form of cancer in women. A large proportion of patients begin with localized disease and undergo treatment with curative intent, while another large proportion of patients debuts with disseminated metastatic disease. In the last subgroup of patients, the prognosis in recent years has changed radically, given the existence of different targeted therapies thanks to the discovery of different biomarkers. Serological, histological, and genetic biomarkers have demonstrated their usefulness in the initial diagnosis, in the follow-up to detect relapses, to guide targeted treatment, and to stratify the prognosis of the most aggressive tumors in those with breast cancer. Molecular markers are currently the basis for the diagnosis of metastatic disease, given the wide variety of chemotherapy regions and existing therapies. These markers have been a real revolution in the therapeutic arsenal for breast cancer, and their diagnostic validity allows the classification of tumors with higher rates of relapse, aggressiveness, and mortality. In this sense, the existence of therapies targeting different molecular alterations causes a series of changes in tumor biology that can be assessed throughout the course of the disease to provide information on the underlying pathophysiology of metastatic disease, which allows us to broaden our knowledge of the different mechanisms of tissue invasion. Therefore, the aim of the present article is to review the clinical, diagnostic, predictive, prognostic utility and limitations of the main biomarkers available and under development in metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, Tumorcirculating tumor cellshistopathological biomarkersmetastatic breast cancerMicroRNAserum biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37176102
PMCPMC10178988
OpenAlexW4376630177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.