Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37176020›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Modeling Human Muscular Dystrophies in Zebrafish: Mutant Lines, Transgenic Fluorescent Biosensors, and Phenotyping Assays.

Chiara Tesoriero, Francesca Greco, Elena Cannone, Francesco Ghirotto, Nicola Facchinello, Marco Schiavone, Andrea Vettori

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Modeling of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in zebrafish.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Modeling Sarcoglycanopathy inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara TesorieroDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Francesca GrecoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Elena CannoneDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-8625
Francesco GhirottoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Nicola FacchinelloNeuroscience Institute, Italian National Research Council (CNR), 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4898-4064
Marco SchiavoneDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8566-5559
Andrea VettoriDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-0619
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITNeuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscular dystrophies (MDs) are a heterogeneous group of myopathies characterized by progressive muscle weakness leading to death from heart or respiratory failure. MDs are caused by mutations in genes involved in both the development and organization of muscle fibers. Several animal models harboring mutations in MD-associated genes have been developed so far. Together with rodents, the zebrafish is one of the most popular animal models used to reproduce MDs because of the high level of sequence homology with the human genome and its genetic manipulability. This review describes the most important zebrafish mutant models of MD and the most advanced tools used to generate and characterize all these valuable transgenic lines. Zebrafish models of MDs have been generated by introducing mutations to muscle-specific genes with different genetic techniques, such as (i) N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) treatment, (ii) the injection of specific morpholino, (iii) tol2-based transgenesis, (iv) TALEN, (v) and CRISPR/Cas9 technology. All these models are extensively used either to study muscle development and function or understand the pathogenetic mechanisms of MDs. Several tools have also been developed to characterize these zebrafish models by checking (i) motor behavior, (ii) muscle fiber structure, (iii) oxidative stress, and (iv) mitochondrial function and dynamics. Further, living biosensor models, based on the expression of fluorescent reporter proteins under the control of muscle-specific promoters or responsive elements, have been revealed to be powerful tools to follow molecular dynamics at the level of a single muscle fiber. Thus, zebrafish models of MDs can also be a powerful tool to search for new drugs or gene therapies able to block or slow down disease progression.

Indexed as

Muscular DiseasesMuscular DystrophiesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedHumansMuscle Fibers, SkeletalZebrafishdisease phenotypein vivo analysismuscular dystrophiestransgenic biosensorszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID37176020
PMCPMC10179009
OpenAlexW4376630870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.