Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37175974›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

MicroRNA Dysregulation in Early Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alejandro Garrido-Palacios, Ana María Rojas Carvajal, Ana María Núñez-Negrillo, Jonathan Cortés-Martín, Juan Carlos Sánchez-García, María José Aguilar-Cordero

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Non-Coding RNAs in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandro Garrido-PalaciosCTS367, Andalusian Plan for Research, Development and Innovation, University of Granada, 18001 Granada, Spain.
Ana María Rojas CarvajalCTS367, Andalusian Plan for Research, Development and Innovation, University of Granada, 18001 Granada, Spain.
Ana María Núñez-NegrilloCTS367, Andalusian Plan for Research, Development and Innovation, University of Granada, 18001 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1377-8140
Jonathan Cortés-MartínDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, University of Granada, 18001 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-8555
Juan Carlos Sánchez-GarcíaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, University of Granada, 18001 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4650-2159
María José Aguilar-CorderoCTS367, Andalusian Plan for Research, Development and Innovation, University of Granada, 18001 Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer continues to be the leading cause of death in women worldwide. Mammography, which is the current gold standard technique used to diagnose it, presents strong limitations in early ages where breast cancer is much more aggressive and fatal. MiRNAs present in numerous body fluids might represent a new line of research in breast cancer biomarkers, especially oncomiRNAs, known to play an important role in the suppression and development of neoplasms. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate dysregulated miRNA biomarkers and their diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer. Two independent researchers reviewed the included studies according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO with the registration number "CRD42021256338". Observational case-control-based studies analyzing concentrations of microRNAs which have been published within the last 10 years were selected, and the concentrations of miRNAs in women with breast cancer and healthy controls were analyzed. Random-effects meta-analyses of miR-155 were performed on the studies which provided enough data to calculate diagnostic odds ratios. We determined that 34 microRNAs were substantially dysregulated and could be considered biomarkers of breast cancer. Individually, miR-155 provided better diagnostic results than mammography on average. However, when several miRNAs are used to screen, forming a panel, sensitivity and specificity rates improve, and they can be associated with classic biomarkers such us CA-125 or CEA. Based on the results of our meta-analysis, miR-155 might be a promising diagnostic biomarker for this patient population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorBreastFemaleHumansSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsbiomarkersbreast cancercancermicro-RNAmiRNA diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID37175974
PMCPMC10179484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.