ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Using Machine Learning and Molecular Docking to Leverage Urease Inhibition Data for Virtual Screening.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based quantitative structure-activity relationship model for antibiotic prediction and discovery.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Review
- Predicting inhibitors of OATP1B1 via heterogeneous OATP-ligand interaction graph neural network (HOLIgraph).Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Classification of Urease Inhibitors Leveraging Physicochemical Properties as Effective Filter Criteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Machine learning and molecular docking prediction of potential inhibitors against dengue virus.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urease is a metalloenzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea, and its modulation has an important role in both the agricultural and medical industry. Even though numerous molecules have been tested against ureases of different species, their clinical translation has been limited due to chemical and metabolic stability as well as side effects. Therefore, screening new compounds against urease would be of interest in part due to rising concerns regarding antibiotic resistance. In this work, we collected and curated a diverse set of 2640 publicly available small-molecule inhibitors of jack bean urease and developed a classifier using a random forest machine learning method with high predictive performance. In addition, the physicochemical features of compounds were paired with molecular docking and protein-ligand fingerprint analysis to gather insight into the current activity landscape. We observed that the docking score could not differentiate active from inactive compounds within each chemical family, but scores were correlated with compound activity when all compounds were considered. Additionally, a decision tree model was built based on 2D and 3D Morgan fingerprints to mine patterns of the known active-class compounds. The final machine learning model showed good prediction performance against the test set (81% and 77% precision for active and inactive compounds, respectively). Finally, this model was employed, as a proof-of-concept, on an in-house library to predict new hits that were then tested against urease and found to be active. This is, to date, the largest, most diverse dataset of compounds used to develop predictive in silico models. Overall, the results highlight the usefulness of using machine learning classifiers and molecular docking to predict novel urease inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.