Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37175889›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Using Machine Learning and Molecular Docking to Leverage Urease Inhibition Data for Virtual Screening.

Natália Aniceto, Tânia S Albuquerque, Vasco D B Bonifácio, Rita C Guedes, Nuno Martinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natália AnicetoResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7039-0022
Tânia S AlbuquerqueiBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, and Associate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy at Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.
Vasco D B BonifácioiBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, and Associate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy at Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2349-8473
Rita C GuedesResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5790-9181
Nuno MartinhoiBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, and Associate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy at Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5102-4756

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia EXPL/QUI-OUT/1288/2021Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PTDC/MED-QUI/3542/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04138/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/04138/2020Fundos Europeus Estruturais e de Investimento LISBOA-01-0246-FEDER-000017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urease is a metalloenzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea, and its modulation has an important role in both the agricultural and medical industry. Even though numerous molecules have been tested against ureases of different species, their clinical translation has been limited due to chemical and metabolic stability as well as side effects. Therefore, screening new compounds against urease would be of interest in part due to rising concerns regarding antibiotic resistance. In this work, we collected and curated a diverse set of 2640 publicly available small-molecule inhibitors of jack bean urease and developed a classifier using a random forest machine learning method with high predictive performance. In addition, the physicochemical features of compounds were paired with molecular docking and protein-ligand fingerprint analysis to gather insight into the current activity landscape. We observed that the docking score could not differentiate active from inactive compounds within each chemical family, but scores were correlated with compound activity when all compounds were considered. Additionally, a decision tree model was built based on 2D and 3D Morgan fingerprints to mine patterns of the known active-class compounds. The final machine learning model showed good prediction performance against the test set (81% and 77% precision for active and inactive compounds, respectively). Finally, this model was employed, as a proof-of-concept, on an in-house library to predict new hits that were then tested against urease and found to be active. This is, to date, the largest, most diverse dataset of compounds used to develop predictive in silico models. Overall, the results highlight the usefulness of using machine learning classifiers and molecular docking to predict novel urease inhibitors.

Indexed as

Enzyme InhibitorsUreaseComputer SimulationMolecular Docking SimulationUreaEnzyme InhibitorsUreaUreaseH. pylorijack bean ureasemachine learningprotein–ligand interactionsQSARrandom foresturease

Identifiers

PMID37175889
PMCPMC10179503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.