ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Potential Biomarkers to Distinguish Type 1 Myocardial Infarction in Troponin-Elevated Diseases.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipidomic and proteomic insights from extracellular vesicles in the postmortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reveal substance use disorder-induced brain changes.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- The Latest Advances in Omics Technology for Assessing Tissue Damage: Implications for the Study of Sudden Cardiac Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- ALK1 Signaling in Human Cardiac Progenitor Cells Promotes a Pro-angiogenic Secretome.Journal of cellular signaling · 2024Article
- From multi-omics approaches to personalized medicine in myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classifying myocardial infarction by subtype is crucial for appropriate patient management. Although troponin is currently the most commonly used biomarker, it is not a specific marker for myocardial infarction and cannot distinguish subtypes. Furthermore, previous studies have confirmed that proteins known as myocardial infarction markers could function to distinguish the type of myocardial infarction. Therefore, we identify a marker that can distinguish type 1 myocardial infarction from other diseases with elevated troponin. We used mass spectrometry to compare type 1 myocardial infarction with other conditions characterized by troponin elevation and identified new candidate markers for disease classification. We then verified these markers, along with those already known to be associated with cardiovascular disease and plaque rupture. We identified
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.