Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37175695›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Advances in Synthetic-Biology-Based Whole-Cell Biosensors: Principles, Genetic Modules, and Applications in Food Safety.

Shijing Chen, Xiaolin Chen, Hongfei Su, Mingzhang Guo, Huilin Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Streptavidin-DisplayingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Bacteria as living biosensors for DNA.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shijing ChenSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing 100048, China.
Xiaolin ChenSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing 100048, China.
Hongfei SuSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing 100048, China.
Mingzhang GuoSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing 100048, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-9185
Huilin LiuSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing 100048, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-2611
Beijing Technology and Business University · CN

Funding

Cultivation Project of Double First-Class Disciplines of Food Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology & Business University BTBUYXTD202204Discipline Construction-Food Science and Engineering SPCX-2022006the Initial Scientific Research Fund for Young Teachers of Beijing Technology and Business University QNJJ2021-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A whole-cell biosensor based on synthetic biology provides a promising new method for the on-site detection of food contaminants. The basic components of whole-cell biosensors include the sensing elements, such as transcription factors and riboswitches, and reporting elements, such as fluorescence, gas, etc. The sensing and reporting elements are coupled through gene expression regulation to form a simple gene circuit for the detection of target substances. Additionally, a more complex gene circuit can involve other functional elements or modules such as signal amplification, multiple detection, and delay reporting. With the help of synthetic biology, whole-cell biosensors are becoming more versatile and integrated, that is, integrating pre-detection sample processing, detection processes, and post-detection signal calculation and storage processes into cells. Due to the relative stability of the intracellular environment, whole-cell biosensors are highly resistant to interference without the need of complex sample preprocessing. Due to the reproduction of chassis cells, whole-cell biosensors replicate all elements automatically without the need for purification processing. Therefore, whole-cell biosensors are easy to operate and simple to produce. Based on the above advantages, whole-cell biosensors are more suitable for on-site detection than other rapid detection methods. Whole-cell biosensors have been applied in various forms such as test strips and kits, with the latest reported forms being wearable devices such as masks, hand rings, and clothing. This paper examines the composition, construction methods, and types of the fundamental components of synthetic biological whole-cell biosensors. We also introduce the prospect and development trend of whole-cell biosensors in commercial applications.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesWearable Electronic DevicesFood SafetyGene Regulatory NetworksSynthetic Biologyfood safetyrapid detectionsynthetic biologywhole-cell biosensor

Identifiers

PMID37175695
PMCPMC10178329
OpenAlexW4367299448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.