Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37175619›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Bact-to-Batch: A Microbiota-Based Tool to Determine Optimal Animal Allocation in Experimental Designs.

Gaël Even, Anthony Mouray, Nicolas Vandenabeele, Sophie Martel, Sophie Merlin, Ségolène Lebrun-Ruer, Magali Chabé, Christophe Audebert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gaël EvenGD Biotech-Gènes Diffusion, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2930-8204
Anthony MourayPlateforme d'Expérimentations et de Hautes Technologies Animales, Institut Pasteur de Lille, F-59019 Lille, France.
Nicolas VandenabeelePlateforme d'Expérimentations et de Hautes Technologies Animales, Institut Pasteur de Lille, F-59019 Lille, France.
Sophie MartelGD Biotech-Gènes Diffusion, F-59000 Lille, France.
Sophie MerlinGD Biotech-Gènes Diffusion, F-59000 Lille, France.
Ségolène Lebrun-RuerGD Biotech-Gènes Diffusion, F-59000 Lille, France.
Magali ChabéCNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR 9017-CIIL-Centre d'Infection et d'Immunité de Lille, Université de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6732-6772
Christophe AudebertGD Biotech-Gènes Diffusion, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-7574
Institut Pasteur de Lille · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basis of any animal experimentation begins with the housing of animals that should take into account the need for splitting animals into similar groups. Even if it is generally recommended to use the minimum number of animals necessary to obtain reliable and statistically significant results (3Rs rule), the allocation of animals is currently mostly based on randomness. Since variability in gut microbiota is an important confounding factor in animal experiments, the main objective of this study was to develop a new approach based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis of the gut microbiota of animals participating in an experiment, in order to correctly assign the animals across batches. For this purpose, a pilot study was performed on 20 mouse faecal samples with the aim of establishing two groups of 10 mice as similar as possible in terms of their faecal microbiota fingerprinting assuming that this approach limits future analytical bias and ensures reproducibility. The suggested approach was challenged with previously published data from a third-party study. This new method allows to embrace the unavoidable microbiota variability between animals in order to limit artefacts and to provide an additional assurance for the reproducibility of animal experiments.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaResearch DesignAnimalsFecesMicePilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S metagenomicsalgorithmanimal batchesexperimental designmicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID37175619
PMCPMC10178137
OpenAlexW4367182929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.