ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Bact-to-Batch: A Microbiota-Based Tool to Determine Optimal Animal Allocation in Experimental Designs.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The basis of any animal experimentation begins with the housing of animals that should take into account the need for splitting animals into similar groups. Even if it is generally recommended to use the minimum number of animals necessary to obtain reliable and statistically significant results (3Rs rule), the allocation of animals is currently mostly based on randomness. Since variability in gut microbiota is an important confounding factor in animal experiments, the main objective of this study was to develop a new approach based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis of the gut microbiota of animals participating in an experiment, in order to correctly assign the animals across batches. For this purpose, a pilot study was performed on 20 mouse faecal samples with the aim of establishing two groups of 10 mice as similar as possible in terms of their faecal microbiota fingerprinting assuming that this approach limits future analytical bias and ensures reproducibility. The suggested approach was challenged with previously published data from a third-party study. This new method allows to embrace the unavoidable microbiota variability between animals in order to limit artefacts and to provide an additional assurance for the reproducibility of animal experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.