ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Interfacial Catalysis during Amylolytic Degradation of Starch Granules: Current Understanding and Kinetic Approaches.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immobilized Copper-Substituted Keggin POM on Graphene Oxide for Highly Selective Heterogeneous Catalysis of Starch Hydrolysis.ACS omega · 2026Article
- The Toxicity of Tire Wear Particles and Their Leachates on Digestion and Gut Microbiota ofToxics · 2026Article
- Regulatory factors of starch metabolism in cereal endosperm.Plant molecular biology · 2026Review
- Plastic Mulching Film and Straw Return Alter Starch Physicochemical and Tuber Textural Properties of Intercropping Potatoes.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Potential of Process-Induced Modification of Potato Starch to Modulate Starch Digestibility and Levels of Resistant Starch Type III.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Metabolic pathways associated with Firmicutes prevalence in the gut of multiple livestock animals and humans.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigation of the physicochemical factors affecting the in vitro digestion and glycemic indices of indigenous indica rice cultivars.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Are cellulases slow? Kinetic and thermodynamic limitations for enzymatic breakdown of cellulose.BBA advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Enzymatic hydrolysis of starch granules forms the fundamental basis of how nature degrades starch in plant cells, how starch is utilized as an energy resource in foods, and develops efficient, low-cost saccharification of starch, such as bioethanol and sweeteners. However, most investigations on starch hydrolysis have focused on its rates of degradation, either in its gelatinized or soluble state. These systems are inherently more well-defined, and kinetic parameters can be readily derived for different hydrolytic enzymes and starch molecular structures. Conversely, hydrolysis is notably slower for solid substrates, such as starch granules, and the kinetics are more complex. The main problems include that the surface of the substrate is multifaceted, its chemical and physical properties are ill-defined, and it also continuously changes as the hydrolysis proceeds. Hence, methods need to be developed for analyzing such heterogeneous catalytic systems. Most data on starch granule degradation are obtained on a long-term enzyme-action basis from which initial rates cannot be derived. In this review, we discuss these various aspects and future possibilities for developing experimental procedures to describe and understand interfacial enzyme hydrolysis of native starch granules more accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.