ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
An Efficient and Robust Method for Chest X-ray Rib Suppression That Improves Pulmonary Abnormality Diagnosis.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paired conditional generative adversarial network for highly accelerated liver 4D MRI.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuppression of thoracic bone shadows on chest X-rays (CXRs) can improve the diagnosis of pulmonary disease. Previous approaches can be categorized as either unsupervised physical models or supervised deep learning models. Physical models can remove the entire ribcage and preserve the morphological lung details but are impractical due to the extremely long processing time. Machine learning (ML) methods are computationally efficient but are limited by the available ground truth (GT) for effective and robust training, resulting in suboptimal results. PURPOSE: To improve bone shadow suppression, we propose a generalizable yet efficient workflow for CXR rib suppression by combining physical and ML methods. MATERIALS AND
methodOur pipeline consists of two stages: (1) pair generation with GT bone shadows eliminated by a physical model in spatially transformed gradient fields; and (2) a fully supervised image denoising network trained on stage-one datasets for fast rib removal from incoming CXRs. For stage two, we designed a densely connected network called SADXNet, combined with a peak signal-to-noise ratio and a multi-scale structure similarity index measure as the loss function to suppress the bony structures. SADXNet organizes the spatial filters in a U shape and preserves the feature map dimension throughout the network flow.
resultsVisually, SADXNet can suppress the rib edges near the lung wall/vertebra without compromising the vessel/abnormality conspicuity. Quantitively, it achieves an RMSE of ~0 compared with the physical model generated GTs, during testing with one prediction in <1 s. Downstream tasks, including lung nodule detection as well as common lung disease classification and localization, are used to provide task-specific evaluations of our rib suppression mechanism. We observed a 3.23% and 6.62% AUC increase, as well as 203 (1273 to 1070) and 385 (3029 to 2644) absolute false positive decreases for lung nodule detection and common lung disease localization, respectively.
conclusionThrough learning from image pairs generated from the physical model, the proposed SADXNet can make a robust sub-second prediction without losing fidelity. Quantitative outcomes from downstream validation further underpin the superiority of SADXNet and the training ML-based rib suppression approaches from the physical model yielded dataset. The training images and SADXNet are provided in the manuscript.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.