Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37175002›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Imaging Features of Intraosseous Schwannoma: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Firoozeh Shomal Zadeh, Arash Azhideh, Jose G Mantilla, Vijaya Kosaraju, Nitin Venugopal, Cree M Gaskin, Atefe Pooyan, Ehsan Alipour, Majid Chalian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Firoozeh Shomal ZadehDivision of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA.
Arash AzhidehDivision of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA.
Jose G MantillaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4752-6459
Vijaya KosarajuDivision of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Nitin VenugopalDivision of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2670-508X
Cree M GaskinDivision of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Atefe PooyanDivision of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA.
Ehsan AlipourDivision of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA.
Majid ChalianDivision of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-1593
University of Washington · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To characterize the imaging features of patients with pathologically confirmed intraosseous schwannoma (IOS), institutional pathology and imaging databases were searched for IOS cases over a period of 17 years. A musculoskeletal radiologist evaluated all imaging studies. Additionally, a literature search was performed to identify IOS cases that had imaging findings of at least two modalities. Six patients (one female, five males, mean age of 50 ± 14 years) with IOS were identified, with all lesions localized to the lumbosacral region. Radiographic imaging was available in four patients, while all patients underwent CT and MR imaging. Radiographs depicted lytic lesions, and CT depicted heterogeneous expansile lesions with centrally hypodense areas and peripheral sclerosis. All cases involved extra-osseous extension, producing a mass effect on adjacent soft tissues and nerve roots. On MRI, the neoplasms displayed iso- to- slightly- low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and hyperintense signal intensity on T2-weighted images with heterogeneous enhancement. The literature review resulted in 102 IOS cases, which to the best of our knowledge, is the largest review on IOS, and the imaging findings of the previously published cases were the same as our cases. IOSs are rare benign neoplasms that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of well-defined expansile lytic lesions with sclerotic borders. This is particularly important in middle-aged adults with mandibular, sacral, or vertebral body mass.

Indexed as

CTimagingintraosseousMRIradiographschwannoma

Identifiers

PMID37175002
PMCPMC10178268
OpenAlexW4368405357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.