Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174979›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Marginal Bone Level and Clinical Parameter Analysis Comparing External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Samuele Fuda, Bruno Gomes Dos Santos Martins, Filipe Correia de Castro, Artak Heboyan, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, Anna Carolina Volpi Mello-Moura, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Failed Dental Implant: When Titanium Fractures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Samuele FudaFaculty of Dental Medicine, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 3504-505 Viseu, Portugal.
Bruno Gomes Dos Santos MartinsFaculty of Dental Medicine, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 3504-505 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0103-2368
Filipe Correia de CastroFP-I3ID, FCS, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal.
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Str. Koryun 2, Yerevan 0025, Armenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8329-3205
Sergio Alexandre GehrkeDepartment of Research, Bioface/PgO/UCAM, Calle Cuareim 1483, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay.
Juliana Campos Hasse FernandesPeriodontics and Oral Medicine Department, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7603-3544
Anna Carolina Volpi Mello-MouraFaculty of Dental Medicine, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 3504-505 Viseu, Portugal.
Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira FernandesPeriodontics and Oral Medicine Department, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-4390
Universidade Católica Portuguesa · PTFernando Pessoa University · PTUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Michigan · USYerevan State Medical University · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this systematic review was to verify the marginal bone loss (MBL) and other clinical parameters comparing external hexagon (EH) and Morse taper (MT) implants when they were evaluated within the same study. The focused question was, "For patients (P) treated with external connection (I) or Morse taper (C) dental implants, were there differences in the marginal bone crest maintenance after at least three months in occlusal function (O)"? As for the inclusion criteria that were considered, they included clinical studies in English that compared the MBL in implants with EH and MT, with follow-up of at least three months, that were published between 2011 and 2022; as for the exclusion criteria, they included publications investigating only one type of connection that analyzed other variables and did not report results for the MBL, reports based on questionnaires, interviews, and case reports/series, systematic reviews, or studies involving patients with a significant health problem (ASA Physical Status 3 and above). The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were screened, and all of the data obtained were registered in a spreadsheet (Excel

Indexed as

clinical parametersdental implant–abutment connectiondental implantsmarginal bone losssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37174979
PMCPMC10178059
OpenAlexW4367311639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.