Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174954›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Computational Intelligence in Cancer Diagnostics: A Contemporary Review of Smart Phone Apps, Current Problems, and Future Research Potentials.

Somit Jain, Dharmik Naicker, Ritu Raj, Vedanshu Patel, Yuh-Chung Hu, Kathiravan Srinivasan, Chun-Ping Jen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Computational Approaches: A New Frontier in Cancer Research.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Somit JainSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Dharmik NaickerSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Ritu RajSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Vedanshu PatelSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Yuh-Chung HuDepartment of Mechanical and Electromechanical Engineering, National ILan University, Yilan 26047, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0183-8182
Kathiravan SrinivasanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9352-0237
Chun-Ping JenSchool of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-5817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a dangerous and sometimes life-threatening disease that can have several negative consequences for the body, is a leading cause of mortality, and is becoming increasingly difficult to detect. Each form of cancer has its own set of traits, symptoms, and therapies, and early identification and management are important for a positive prognosis. Doctors utilize a variety of approaches to detect cancer, depending on the kind and location of the tumor. Imaging tests such as X-rays, Computed Tomography scans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans, and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans, which may provide precise pictures of the body's interior structures to spot any abnormalities, are some of the tools that doctors use to diagnose cancer. This article evaluates computational-intelligence approaches and provides a means to impact future work by focusing on the relevance of machine learning and deep learning models such as K Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Deep Neural Network, Deep Boltzmann machine, and so on. It evaluates information from 114 studies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). This article explores the advantages and disadvantages of each model and provides an outline of how they are used in cancer diagnosis. In conclusion, artificial intelligence shows significant potential to enhance cancer imaging and diagnosis, despite the fact that there are a number of clinical issues that need to be addressed.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancer diagnosiscomputer-aided diagnosticsdeep learningmachine learningman-machine systemssmart phone applications

Identifiers

PMID37174954
PMCPMC10178016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.