Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174865›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Intervention to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Behavior among Medically Underserved Women: Effectiveness of 3R Communication Model.

Matthew Asare, Anjelica Elizondo, Mina Dwumfour-Poku, Carlos Mena, Mariela Gutierrez, Hadii M Mamudu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding HPV Vaccination and Self-Sampling Among US Young Adults.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew AsareDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6831-3586
Anjelica ElizondoDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Mina Dwumfour-PokuDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Carlos MenaNorth American University, Stafford, TX 77477, USA.
Mariela GutierrezDepartment of Population Health and Health Disparities, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Hadii M MamuduCollege of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.
Baylor University · USEast Tennessee State University · USNorth American University · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling has the potential to increase Cervical Cancer Screening (CCS) and reduce the cervical cancer burden in Medically Underserved Women (MUW). However, interventions promoting self-sampling are limited. We examined the effectiveness of an intervention study in increasing CCS among MUW. We conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study. A face-to-face verbal approach was used to recruit MUW (

Indexed as

3R communication modelcervical cancer screeningmedically underserved womenself-sampling

Identifiers

PMID37174865
PMCPMC10178119
OpenAlexW4372346129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.