Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174848›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Heterogeneous Mental Health Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: An Examination of Long-Term Trajectories, Risk Factors, and Vulnerable Groups.

Malvika Godara, Jessie Rademacher, Martin Hecht, Sarita Silveira, Manuel C Voelkle, Tania Singer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malvika GodaraSocial Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society, 10557 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5568-9007
Jessie RademacherSocial Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society, 10557 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-2281-1044
Martin HechtDepartment of Psychology, Helmut Schmidt University, 22043 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5168-4911
Sarita SilveiraSocial Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society, 10557 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1530-8203
Manuel C VoelkleInstitute of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-8103
Tania SingerSocial Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society, 10557 Berlin, Germany.
Max Planck Society · DEHelmut Schmidt University · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

Berlin University Alliance 114_GC_Pandemie_23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abundant studies have examined mental health in the early periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, empirical work examining the mental health impact of the pandemic's subsequent phases remains limited. In the present study, we investigated how mental vulnerability and resilience evolved over the various phases of the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 in Germany. Data were collected (n = 3522) across seven measurement occasions using validated and self-generated measures of vulnerability and resilience. We found evidence for an immediate increase in vulnerability during the first lockdown in Germany, a trend towards recovery when lockdown measures were eased, and an increase in vulnerability with each passing month of the second lockdown. Four different latent trajectories of resilience-vulnerability emerged, with the majority of participants displaying a rather resilient trajectory, but nearly 30% of the sample fell into the more vulnerable groups. Females, younger individuals, those with a history of psychiatric disorders, lower income groups, and those with high trait vulnerability and low trait social belonging were more likely to exhibit trajectories associated with poorer mental well-being. Our findings indicate that resilience-vulnerability responses in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been more complex than previously thought, identifying risk groups that could benefit from greater support.

Indexed as

COVID-19mental healthpandemicresiliencetrajectoriesvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID37174848
PMCPMC10177770
OpenAlexW4376630678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.