ArticleCells2023
Selection of Cell Populations with High or Low Surface Marker Expression Using Magnetic Sorting.
Article in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- MagSculptor: A Microfluidic Platform for High-Resolution Magnetic Fractionation of Low-Expression Cell Subtypes.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Article
- CD99-targeted immunomagnetic negative selection: A novel strategy for high-purity pancreatic islet isolation in murine models.PloS one · 2026Article
- CD52/FLAG and CD52/HA Fusion Proteins as Novel Magnetic Cell Selection Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic cell sorting technology stands out because of its speed, simplicity, and ability to process large cell numbers. However, it also suffers from a number of drawbacks, in particular low discrimination power, which results in all-or-none selection outcomes limited to a bulk separation of cell populations into positive and negative fractions, as well as the modest purity of the selected cells and the inability to select subpopulations of cells with high expression of a surface marker. In the present study, we developed a simple solution to this problem and confirmed the effectiveness of this approach by multiple experiments with the magnetic selection of transduced cell populations. Murine NIH 3T3 cells were transduced with the bicistronic retroviral vector constructs co-expressing fluorescent reporter proteins EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) or DsRed-Express 2 and LNGFR (low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor) as surface selection markers. The effects of the magnetic selection of transduced cells with anti-LNGFR Micro Bead (MB) doses ranging from 0.5 to 80 µL have been assessed. Low doses of MBs favored the depletion of weakly positive cells from the population, resulting in the higher expression levels of EGFP or DsRed-Express2 reporters in the selected cell fractions. Low MB doses also contributed to the increased purity of the selected population, even for samples with a low initial percentage of positive cells. At the same time, high MB doses resulted in the increased yield and a more faithful representation of the original expression profiles following selection. We further demonstrate that for populations with fairly narrow distribution of expression levels, it is possible to achieve separation into high- and low-expressing subsets using the two-stage selection scheme based on the sequential use of low and high doses of MBs. For populations with broad expression distribution, a one-stage selection with low or high doses of MBs is sufficient for a clear separation of low- and high-expressing subsets in the column-retained and flow-through fractions, respectively. This study substantially extends the potential of magnetic cell sorting, and may open new possibilities in a number of biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.