Trial reportCells2023
Evaluation of Blood Tumor Mutation Burden for the Efficacy of Second-Line Atezolizumab Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: BUDDY Trial.
Trial report in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-Cancer Detectability of ctDNA Biomarkers in Asian Populations: Implications for Pan-Cancer Detection.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Integration of Liquid Biopsy for Optimal Management of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2025Article
- Identification and Application of Emerging Biomarkers in Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Blood-based biomarkers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint blockade.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Review
- Challenges and Future Directions in the Management of Tumor Mutational Burden-High (TMB-H) Advanced Solid Malignancies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Liquid Biopsy in NSCLC: An Investigation with Multiple Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of blood-based biomarkers, including blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB), to predict atezolizumab efficacy in relapsed and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stage IV NSCLC patients who had previously received platinum-doublet chemotherapy were recruited and received 1200 mg of atezolizumab every three weeks. Blood was collected to obtain plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) before the first cycle (C0) and at the fourth cycle (C4). bTMB was measured by CT-ULTRA in patients with cfDNA over 10 ng. The objective response rate (ORR) of the enrolled 100 patients was 10%, and there was no difference in ORR according to bTMB (cutoff: 11.5 muts/Mb) at C0 (high bTMB: 8.1% vs. low bTMB: 11.1%). However, the C4/C0 bTMB ratio was significantly lower in the durable clinical benefit (DCB) patients. The cfDNA concentration at C0, the C4/C0 ratio of the cfDNA concentration, the highest variant allele frequency (hVAF), and the VAF standard deviation (VAFSD) were significantly lower in the DCB patients. In the multivariate analysis, a high cfDNA concentration at C0 (cutoff: 8.6 ng/mL) and a C4/C0 bTMB ratio greater than 1 were significantly associated with progression-free survival. These results suggest that baseline levels and dynamic changes of blood-based biomarkers (bTMB, cfDNA concentration, and VAFSD) could predict atezolizumab efficacy in previously treated NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.