Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174573›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Effects of Dietary Probiotics and Acidifiers on the Production Performance, Colostrum Components, Serum Antioxidant Activity and Hormone Levels, and Gene Expression in Mammary Tissue of Lactating Sows.

Hongzhi Wu, Chaohua Xu, Jingjing Wang, Chengjun Hu, Fengjie Ji, Jiajun Xie, Yun Yang, Xilong Yu, Xinping Diao, Renlong Lv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Role of Nutrition Across Production Stages to Improve Sow Longevity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongzhi WuTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5722-9357
Chaohua XuTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Jingjing WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Chengjun HuTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-6445
Fengjie JiTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Jiajun XieCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yun YangTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Xilong YuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Xinping DiaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Renlong LvTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences · CNNortheast Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Hainan Modern Agricultural Production Research System HNARS2022-2-G3Nonprofit start-up funding PZS2023015the China Scholarship Council (CSC) National Public Graduate Program for Building Highly Qualified Universities
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to test the effects of dietary probiotics and acidifiers on the production performance, colostrum components, serum antioxidant activity and hormone levels, and gene expression in the mammary tissue of lactating sows. Four treatments were administered with six replicates to 24 lactating sows. The control group (GC) received a basal diet, while the experimental groups received a basal diet with 200 mL/d probiotics (GP), 0.5% acidifiers (GA), and 200 mL/d probiotics + 0.5% acidifiers (GM), respectively. Compared with the GC, (1) the average weight of the piglets on the 21st day of lactation in the GM was higher (

Indexed as

acidifierscolostrum componentslactating sowsmammary tissueprobioticsserum antioxidant activity and hormone levels

Identifiers

PMID37174573
PMCPMC10177095
OpenAlexW4376630239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.