Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174555›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Evaluation Survey on Agreement with Existing Definitions of Biosecurity with a Focus on Livestock.

Claude Saegerman, Gianni Parisi, Jarkko Niemi, Marie-France Humblet, Jorge Ron-Román, Bachir Souley Kouato, Alberto Allepuz, Vincent Porphyre, Maria Rodrigues da Costa, Véronique Renault

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Livestock Biosecurity from a One Health Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Claude SaegermanResearch Unit in Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULiege), Fundamental and Applied Research for Animal Health (FARAH) Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9087-7436
Gianni ParisiResearch Unit in Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULiege), Fundamental and Applied Research for Animal Health (FARAH) Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-4004
Jarkko NiemiBioeconomy and Environment Unit, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 60320 Seinäjoki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-3509
Marie-France HumbletUnit of Faculty Biosecurity, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Liege University, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4069-9402
Jorge Ron-RománGrupo de Investigación en Sanidad Animal y Humana (GISAH), Carrera de Ingeniería en Agropecuaria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida y la Agricultura, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas-ESPE, Sangolquí P.O. Box 171-5-231, Ecuador.
Bachir Souley KouatoInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), Niamey P.O. Box 429, Niger.
Alberto AllepuzDepartment of Animal Health and Anatomy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3518-1991
Vincent PorphyreCIRAD, UMR SELMET, F-34398 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5561-2667
Maria Rodrigues da CostaCentre for Epidemiology and Planetary Health (CEPH), Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Inverness Campus, Inverness IV2 5NA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2152-4009
Véronique RenaultAgronomes et Vétérinaires Sans Frontières, 69007 Lyon, France.
University of Liège · BECentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger · NENatural Resources Institute Finland · FIScotland's Rural College · GBUniversidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE · ECUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology COST Action BETTER, CA20103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease prevention, including biosecurity, surveillance, and traceability are key aspects to minimize the risk of animal diseases causing harm to society. Diseases for which biosecurity are needed depend on species of interest, e.g., African swine fever, avian influenza, or foot-and-mouth disease. However, several definitions of biosecurity co-exist in the literature. Under the new COST Action "Biosecurity Enhanced Through Training Evaluation and Raising Awareness" (BETTER) CA20103, we launched an initial survey on the agreement with eight existing definitions of (livestock) biosecurity, to rank keywords to consider before attempting a more consolidated definition, and to select the desirable qualities of a definition of livestock biosecurity. Respondents (N = 316) had a male-female gender ratio close to one, were mostly between 25 and 54 years old, and had animal health as the main field of expertise (30% were government officials). The significant most popular biosecurity definition was the one that conceptualized the rules of 5B's (bio-exclusion, bio-containment, bio-compartmentation, bio-prevention, and bio-preservation). The top two keywords to consider for the consolidation of the biosecurity definition were "prevention" and "measures". The optimal biosecurity definition needs to be operational and related to animal health but also comprehensible, simple, and related to public health. The survey results highlight the need for the integration of more aspects in the existing definitions of livestock biosecurity (prevention of zoonoses and preservation of the environment and diversity).

Indexed as

agreementbiosecuritydefinitionEU COST ActionlivestockOne Healthstakeholdersurvey

Identifiers

PMID37174555
PMCPMC10177301
OpenAlexW4367627253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.