Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174346›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Consumer Awareness and Acceptance of Biotechnological Solutions for Gluten-Free Products.

Paola Sangiorgio, Simona Errico, Alessandra Verardi, Silvia Massa, Riccardo Pagliarello, Carla Marusic, Chiara Lico, Ombretta Presenti, Marcello Donini, Selene Baschieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paola SangiorgioLaboratory Bioproducts and Bioprocesses, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Trisaia Research Centre, 75026 Rotondella, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8769-1910
Simona ErricoLaboratory Bioproducts and Bioprocesses, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Trisaia Research Centre, 75026 Rotondella, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2873-9339
Alessandra VerardiLaboratory Bioproducts and Bioprocesses, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Trisaia Research Centre, 75026 Rotondella, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2561-4127
Silvia MassaLaboratory Biotechnologies, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Centre, Santa Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy.
Riccardo PagliarelloLaboratory Biotechnologies, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Centre, Santa Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-7209
Carla MarusicLaboratory Biotechnologies, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Centre, Santa Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy.
Chiara LicoLaboratory Biotechnologies, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Centre, Santa Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8475-5141
Ombretta PresentiLaboratory Biotechnologies, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Centre, Santa Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy.
Marcello DoniniLaboratory Biotechnologies, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Centre, Santa Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy.
Selene BaschieriLaboratory Biotechnologies, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Centre, Santa Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7147-7840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease is an immune-mediated disorder caused by the ingestion of gluten proteins. The gluten-free diet is currently the only therapy to achieve the symptoms' remission. Biotechnological approaches are currently being explored to obtain safer and healthier food for celiacs. This article analyzes consumer awareness and acceptance of advanced biotechnologies to develop gluten-free products. An online snowball sampling questionnaire was proposed to 511 Italian participants, selected among celiac and non-celiac people, from December 2020 to January 2021, during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, 64% of respondents favor food biotechnology, as long as it has benefits for health or the environment. Moreover, biotechnology perception differs according to education level and type. A total of 65% of the survey participants would taste gluten-free products obtained through a biotechnological approach, and 57% would buy them at a higher price than the current market price. Our results show a change in public opinion about the usefulness of food biotechnology and its moral acceptability compared to 20 years ago. However, the study of public opinion is very complex, dealing with individuals with social, economic, and cultural differences. Undoubtedly, the scientific dissemination of genetic biotechnologies must be more effective and usable to increase the level of citizens' awareness.

Indexed as

consumer acceptanceconsumer behaviorfood biotechnologygluten-free productspublic opinion

Identifiers

PMID37174346
PMCPMC10178753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.