Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174247›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Mobility in People Post-Stroke.

Maria Tereza Artero Prado Dantas, Deborah Cristina Gonçalves Luiz Fernani, Talita Dias da Silva, Iramaia Salomão Alexandre de Assis, Augusto Cesinando de Carvalho, Sidney Benedito Silva, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Fabio Augusto Barbieri, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Tereza Artero Prado DantasLaboratory Design and Scientific Writing, Department of Basic Sciences, ABC Faculty of Medicine, Santo André 09060-650, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8836-1094
Deborah Cristina Gonçalves Luiz FernaniLaboratory Design and Scientific Writing, Department of Basic Sciences, ABC Faculty of Medicine, Santo André 09060-650, Brazil.
Talita Dias da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Medicine (Cardiology) at Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM/UNIFESP), São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4683-4671
Iramaia Salomão Alexandre de AssisDepartment of Physical Education, Human Movement Research Laboratory (MOVI-LAB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru 17033-360, Brazil.
Augusto Cesinando de CarvalhoDepartment of Physiotherapy, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente 19060-900, Brazil.
Sidney Benedito SilvaLaboratory Design and Scientific Writing, Department of Basic Sciences, ABC Faculty of Medicine, Santo André 09060-650, Brazil.
Luiz Carlos de AbreuLaboratory Design and Scientific Writing, Department of Basic Sciences, ABC Faculty of Medicine, Santo André 09060-650, Brazil.
Fabio Augusto BarbieriDepartment of Physical Education, Human Movement Research Laboratory (MOVI-LAB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru 17033-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3678-8456
Carlos Bandeira de Mello MonteiroLaboratory Design and Scientific Writing, Department of Basic Sciences, ABC Faculty of Medicine, Santo André 09060-650, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2661-775X
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRFaculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Cidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade do Oeste Paulista · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability. To identify the best treatment strategies for people with stroke (PwS), the aim of the current study was to compare the effects of training on a treadmill with functional electrical stimulation (TT-FES) with training on a treadmill (TT), and to analyze the effects of sequence of training on mobility and the parameters of walking ability. (2) Methods: Prospective, longitudinal, randomized and crossover study, in which 28 PwS were distributed into groups, namely the A-B Group (TT-FES followed by TT) and B-A Group (TT followed by TT-FES), using the foot drop stimulator, and were measured with functional tests. (3) Results: We found improved mobility, balance, non-paretic limb coordination, and endurance only in the group that started with TT-FES. However, sensorimotor function improved regardless of the order of training, and paretic limb coordination only improved in the B-A Group, but after TT-FES. These data indicate that the order of the protocols changed the results. (4) Conclusions: Although biomechanical evaluation methods were not used, which can be considered a limitation, our results showed that TT-FES was superior to isolated training on a treadmill with regard to balance, endurance capacity, and coordination of the non-paretic limb.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyGait Disorders, NeurologicStrokeStroke RehabilitationCross-Over StudiesElectric StimulationGaitHumansProspective Studieselectrical stimulationgaithemiparesismobilitystroke

Identifiers

PMID37174247
PMCPMC10178257
OpenAlexW4372346406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.