Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37174121›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Automated Deep Learning-Based Classification of Wilms Tumor Histopathology.

Ananda van der Kamp, Thomas de Bel, Ludo van Alst, Jikke Rutgers, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Annelies M C Mavinkurve-Groothuis, Jeroen van der Laak, Ronald R de Krijger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Exploring theFrontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ananda van der KampPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 24, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3868-4316
Thomas de BelDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 1, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ludo van AlstDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 1, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-4655-4337
Jikke RutgersPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 24, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 24, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-879X
Annelies M C Mavinkurve-GroothuisPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 24, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6984-3626
Jeroen van der LaakDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 1, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-0754
Ronald R de KrijgerPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 24, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6871-1296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Histopathological assessment of Wilms tumors (WT) is crucial for risk group classification to guide postoperative stratification in chemotherapy pre-treated WT cases. However, due to the heterogeneous nature of the tumor, significant interobserver variation between pathologists in WT diagnosis has been observed, potentially leading to misclassification and suboptimal treatment. We investigated whether artificial intelligence (AI) can contribute to accurate and reproducible histopathological assessment of WT through recognition of individual histopathological tumor components. (2) Methods: We assessed the performance of a deep learning-based AI system in quantifying WT components in hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides by calculating the Sørensen-Dice coefficient for fifteen predefined renal tissue components, including six tumor-related components. We trained the AI system using multiclass annotations from 72 whole-slide images of patients diagnosed with WT. (3) Results: The overall Dice coefficient for all fifteen tissue components was 0.85 and for the six tumor-related components was 0.79. Tumor segmentation worked best to reliably identify necrosis (Dice coefficient 0.98) and blastema (Dice coefficient 0.82). (4) Conclusions: Accurate histopathological classification of WT may be feasible using a digital pathology-based AI system in a national cohort of WT patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep-learningpediatric pathologytumor segmentationWilms tumor

Identifiers

PMID37174121
PMCPMC10177041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.