ReviewCancers2023
Artificial Intelligence in CT and MR Imaging for Oncological Applications.
Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in personalized computed tomography dose optimization: a systematic review of techniques and clinical outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Extended reality in skull base surgery: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Enhanced Glioblastoma Detection ThroughMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Preoperative Molecular Characterization of Adult-Type Diffuse High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Multi-class transformer-based segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and surrounding structures in CT imaging: a multi-center evaluation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- AI-engineered multifunctional nanoplatforms: synergistically bridging precision diagnosis and intelligent therapy in next-generation oncology.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Advancing circular economy practices in radiography: a narrative review of sustainable medical imaging.Translational cancer research · 2025Review
- Meta-Analysis of AI Integration in Abdominal Imaging for Liver Fibrosis and MASLD: Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Impact.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Review
- Generative artificial intelligence, large language models and ChatGPT in musculoskeletal Oncology: Current applications and future potential.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for prostate cancer: Optimizing diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in revolutionizing orthodontic practice.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing spine surgery with emerging AI-FEA integration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of AI support levels in clinical interpretation of traumatic pelvic radiographs.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- AI enhanced model predictive control for optimizing LPG recovery through integrated computational modeling design of experiments and multivariate regression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: Transforming Diagnostics, Treatment, and Patient Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating motion capture technology and intraoral ultrasonography for 3D anatomical analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive surgical procedures: scoping review.BJS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer care increasingly relies on imaging for patient management. The two most common cross-sectional imaging modalities in oncology are computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which provide high-resolution anatomic and physiological imaging. Herewith is a summary of recent applications of rapidly advancing artificial intelligence (AI) in CT and MRI oncological imaging that addresses the benefits and challenges of the resultant opportunities with examples. Major challenges remain, such as how best to integrate AI developments into clinical radiology practice, the vigorous assessment of quantitative CT and MR imaging data accuracy, and reliability for clinical utility and research integrity in oncology. Such challenges necessitate an evaluation of the robustness of imaging biomarkers to be included in AI developments, a culture of data sharing, and the cooperation of knowledgeable academics with vendor scientists and companies operating in radiology and oncology fields. Herein, we will illustrate a few challenges and solutions of these efforts using novel methods for synthesizing different contrast modality images, auto-segmentation, and image reconstruction with examples from lung CT as well as abdome, pelvis, and head and neck MRI. The imaging community must embrace the need for quantitative CT and MRI metrics beyond lesion size measurement. AI methods for the extraction and longitudinal tracking of imaging metrics from registered lesions and understanding the tumor environment will be invaluable for interpreting disease status and treatment efficacy. This is an exciting time to work together to move the imaging field forward with narrow AI-specific tasks. New AI developments using CT and MRI datasets will be used to improve the personalized management of cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.