Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173971›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

A Phase I Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of Epidiolex (Cannabidiol) in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Zin W Myint, William H St Clair, Stephen E Strup, Donglin Yan, Ning Li, Derek B Allison, Laurie E McLouth, Carleton S Ellis, Peng Wang, Andrew C James and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. The logarithmic phase as a therapeutic direction: evaluating pharmacological strategies against cancer progression.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Current and Potential Use of Biologically Active Compounds Derived fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zin W MyintDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3479-4203
William H St ClairMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Stephen E StrupMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8584-375X
Donglin YanMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5111-9437
Ning LiMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9383-7381
Derek B AllisonMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5119-2474
Laurie E McLouthDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Carleton S EllisMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Peng WangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Andrew C JamesMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Patrick J HensleyMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Danielle E OttoMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Susanne M ArnoldDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Robert S DiPaolaMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Jill M KolesarMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-6439
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001996 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BUSH, MATTHEW LEE, KELLY, THOMAS H. · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001996NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCannabinoids (CBD) have anti-tumor activity against prostate cancer (PCa). Preclinical studies have demonstrated a significant decrease in prostate specific antigen (PSA) protein expression and reduced tumor growth in xenografts of LNCaP and DU-145 cells in athymic mice when treated with CBD. Over-the-counter CBD products may vary in activity without clear standardization, and Epidiolex is a standardized FDA-approved oral CBD solution for treatment of certain types of seizures. We aimed to assess the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of Epidiolex in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) PCa. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis was an open-label, single center, phase I dose escalation study followed by a dose expansion in BCR patients after primary definitive local therapy (prostatectomy +/- salvage radiotherapy or primary definitive radiotherapy). Eligible patients were screened for urine tetrahydrocannabinol prior to enrollment. The starting dose level of Epidiolex was 600 mg by mouth once daily and escalated to 800 mg daily with the use of a Bayesian optimal interval design. All patients were treated for 90 days followed by a 10-day taper. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Changes in PSA, testosterone levels, and patient-reported health-related quality of life were studied as secondary endpoints.

resultsSeven patients were enrolled into the dose escalation cohort. There were no dose-limiting toxicities at the first two dose levels (600 mg and 800 mg). An additional 14 patients were enrolled at the 800 mg dose level into the dose expansion cohort. The most common adverse events were 55% diarrhea (grade 1-2), 25% nausea (grade 1-2), and 20% fatigue (grade 1-2). The mean PSA at baseline was 2.9 ng/mL. At the 12-week landmark time-point, 16 out of 18 (88%) had stable biochemical disease, one (5%) had partial biochemical response with the greatest measurable decline being 41%, and one (5%) had PSA progression. No statistically significant changes were observed in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), but PROs changed in the direction of supporting the tolerability of Epidiolex (e.g., emotional functioning improved).

conclusionEpidiolex at a dose of 800 mg daily appears to be safe and tolerable in patients with BCR prostate cancer supporting a safe dose for future studies.

Indexed as

biochemical recurrence prostate cancercannabinoid receptor 1 expressionepidiolexpatient reported quality of lifeprostate specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID37173971
PMCPMC10177512
OpenAlexW4367181996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.