Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173938›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

The Spinal Cord as Organ of Risk: Assessment for Acute and Subacute Neurological Adverse Effects after Microbeam Radiotherapy in a Rodent Model.

Felix Jaekel, Jason Paino, Elette Engels, Mitzi Klein, Micah Barnes, Daniel Häusermann, Christopher Hall, Gang Zheng, Hongxin Wang, Guido Hildebrandt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix JaekelDepartment of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4212-8315
Jason PainoCentre of Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3648-7880
Elette EngelsCentre of Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4704-2104
Mitzi KleinAustralian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton 3168, Australia.
Micah BarnesAustralian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8691-0616
Daniel HäusermannAustralian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton 3168, Australia.
Christopher HallAustralian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton 3168, Australia.
Gang ZhengMonash Biomedical Imaging, Clayton 3168, Australia.
Hongxin WangMonash Biomedical Imaging, Clayton 3168, Australia.
Guido HildebrandtDepartment of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Michael LerchCentre of Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2406-9972
Elisabeth SchültkeDepartment of Radiooncology, Rostock University Medical Center, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation · AUUniversity of Rostock · DEUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation 15731Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHU 2589/7German Academic Exchange Service PPP 57444927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT), a high dose rate radiotherapy technique using spatial dose fractionation at the micrometre range, has shown a high therapeutic efficacy in vivo in different tumour entities, including lung cancer. We have conducted a toxicity study for the spinal cord as organ of risk during irradiation of a target in the thoracic cavity. In young adult rats, the lower thoracic spinal cord was irradiated over a length of 2 cm with an array of quasi-parallel microbeams of 50 µm width, spaced at a centre-to-centre distance of 400 µm, with MRT peak doses up to 800 Gy. No acute or subacute adverse effects were observed within the first week after irradiation up to MRT peak doses of 400 Gy. No significant differences were seen between irradiated animals and non-irradiated controls in motor function and sensitivity, open field test and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). After irradiation with MRT peak doses of 450-800 Gy, dose-dependent neurologic signs occurred. Provided that long-term studies do not reveal significant morbidity due to late toxicity, an MRT dose of 400 Gy can be considered safe for the spinal cord in the tested beam geometry and field size.

Indexed as

dosimetryelectrophysiologymicrobeam radiotherapy (MRT)motor functionMRI imagingsensibilityspinal cord as organ of risktoxicity study

Identifiers

PMID37173938
PMCPMC10177263
OpenAlexW4367052653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.