ReviewCancers2023
Diagnostic Bioliquid Markers for Pancreatic Cancer: What We Have vs. What We Need.
Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of Pancreatic Cancer via Specific Metabolite Markers: A Metabolomics Approach.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Exploring correlations of CA19-9 with serum enzyme ratios: can layered biomarker strategies enhance prognostic accuracy in pancreatic cancer?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- MetaPaCS: A Novel Meta-Learning Framework for Pancreatic Cancer Subtype Identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Targeting IL-12 for pancreatic cancer immunotherapy: advances in delivery strategies and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Catching pancreatic cancer early: the promise of affordable biomarkers to regularly screen high-risk individuals.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Soluble CTLA-4 and high-risk genetic variants: A new frontier in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) biomarkers.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Confirmatory Clinical Validation of a Serum-Based Biomarker Signature for Detection of Early-Stage Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- DNA methylation profile to aid in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its role in disease progression.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Multibiomarker panels in liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic cancer - a comprehensive review.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Review
- Review
- Cytokine CCL9 Mediates Oncogenic KRAS-Induced Pancreatic Acinar-to-Ductal Metaplasia by Promoting Reactive Oxygen Species and Metalloproteinases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A Quest for Survival: A Review of the Early Biomarkers of Pancreatic Cancer and the Most Effective Approaches at Present.Biomolecules · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common type of pancreatic cancer, currently has a dismal five-year survival rate of approximately 10% due to late diagnosis and a lack of efficient treatment options such as surgery. Furthermore, the majority of PDAC patients have surgically unresectable cancer, meaning cancer cells have either reached the surrounding blood vessels or metastasized to other organs distant from the pancreas area, resulting in low survival rates as compared to other types of cancers. In contrast, the five-year survival rate of surgically resectable PDAC patients is currently 44%. The late diagnosis of PDAC is a result of little or no symptoms in its early stage of development and a lack of specific biomarkers that may be utilized in routine examinations in the clinic. Although healthcare professionals understand the importance of early detection of PDAC, the research on the subject has lagged and no significant changes in the death toll of PDAC patients has been observed. This review is focused on understanding potential biomarkers that may increase the early diagnosis of PDAC patients at its surgically resectable stage. Here, we summarize the currently available biomarkers used in the clinic as well as those being developed with the hope of providing insight into the future of liquid biomarkers to be used in routine examinations for the early diagnosis of PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.