Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173897›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Novel Mechanisms and Future Opportunities for the Management of Radiation Necrosis in Patients Treated for Brain Metastases in the Era of Immunotherapy.

Eugene J Vaios, Sebastian F Winter, Helen A Shih, Jorg Dietrich, Katherine B Peters, Scott R Floyd, John P Kirkpatrick, Zachary J Reitman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Incidence of radiation necrosis following different radiotherapy fractionation schedules for intracranial meningiomas.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Value of artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology.The Lancet. Digital health · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Decoding Patient Heterogeneity Influencing Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eugene J VaiosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2122-6650
Sebastian F WinterDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8836-0235
Helen A ShihDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Jorg DietrichDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8291-0136
Katherine B PetersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Scott R FloydDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
John P KirkpatrickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Zachary J ReitmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9122-9550
Duke Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Duke Radiation Oncology and Radiology Stimulating Access to Research in ResidencyR38CA245204 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FLOYD, SCOTT R · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R38 CA245204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation necrosis, also known as treatment-induced necrosis, has emerged as an important adverse effect following stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) for brain metastases. The improved survival of patients with brain metastases and increased use of combined systemic therapy and SRS have contributed to a growing incidence of necrosis. The cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway (cGAS-STING) represents a key biological mechanism linking radiation-induced DNA damage to pro-inflammatory effects and innate immunity. By recognizing cytosolic double-stranded DNA, cGAS induces a signaling cascade that results in the upregulation of type 1 interferons and dendritic cell activation. This pathway could play a key role in the pathogenesis of necrosis and provides attractive targets for therapeutic development. Immunotherapy and other novel systemic agents may potentiate activation of cGAS-STING signaling following radiotherapy and increase necrosis risk. Advancements in dosimetric strategies, novel imaging modalities, artificial intelligence, and circulating biomarkers could improve the management of necrosis. This review provides new insights into the pathophysiology of necrosis and synthesizes our current understanding regarding the diagnosis, risk factors, and management options of necrosis while highlighting novel avenues for discovery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebrain metastasescGAS-STINGcirculating biomarkersimmunotherapynecrosisstereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID37173897
PMCPMC10177360
OpenAlexW4366827051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.