Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173746›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2023

Cross-phyla protein annotation by structural prediction and alignment.

Fabian Ruperti, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, Jacob M Musser, Milot Mirdita, Martin Steinegger, Detlev Arendt

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Functional (re)annotation ofCurrent research in structural biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Current zoology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of metagenomic data.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  14. Proteomic analysis of the sponge Aggregation Factor implicates an ancient toolkit for allorecognition and adhesion in animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. AlphaFold two years on: Validation and impact.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. The genome of the colonial hydroidGenome research · 2024
    Article
  18. Functional domain annotation by structural similarity.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Fabian Ruperti *Developmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nikolaos Papadopoulos *Developmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jacob M MusserDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Milot MirditaSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Martin SteineggerSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Detlev ArendtDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. detlev.arendt@embl.de.
Seoul National University · KREuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEHeidelberg University · USUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein annotation is a major goal in molecular biology, yet experimentally determined knowledge is typically limited to a few model organisms. In non-model species, the sequence-based prediction of gene orthology can be used to infer protein identity; however, this approach loses predictive power at longer evolutionary distances. Here we propose a workflow for protein annotation using structural similarity, exploiting the fact that similar protein structures often reflect homology and are more conserved than protein sequences.

resultsWe propose a workflow of openly available tools for the functional annotation of proteins via structural similarity (MorF: MorphologFinder) and use it to annotate the complete proteome of a sponge. Sponges are highly relevant for inferring the early history of animals, yet their proteomes remain sparsely annotated. MorF accurately predicts the functions of proteins with known homology in [Formula: see text] cases and annotates an additional [Formula: see text] of the proteome beyond standard sequence-based methods. We uncover new functions for sponge cell types, including extensive FGF, TGF, and Ephrin signaling in sponge epithelia, and redox metabolism and control in myopeptidocytes. Notably, we also annotate genes specific to the enigmatic sponge mesocytes, proposing they function to digest cell walls.

conclusionsOur work demonstrates that structural similarity is a powerful approach that complements and extends sequence similarity searches to identify homologous proteins over long evolutionary distances. We anticipate this will be a powerful approach that boosts discovery in numerous -omics datasets, especially for non-model organisms.

Indexed as

ProteomeAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteomeConservationFunctional annotationMorphologProtein homologyProteinsscRNA-seqSpongillaStructural similarityStructure

Identifiers

PMID37173746
PMCPMC10176882
OpenAlexW4376278240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.