Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173736›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2023

Effect of pharmacogenomics testing guiding on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT.

Xinrui Wang, Chenfei Wang, Yi Zhang, Zhuoling An

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pharmacogenetic Influence on Stereoselective Steady-State Disposition of Bupropion.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2024
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinrui Wang *Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Chenfei Wang *Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China. jeffzhang1619@outlook.com.
Zhuoling AnDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China. anzhuoling@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacogenomic testing guided treatment have been developed to guide drug selection or conversion in major depressive disorder patients. Whether patients benefit from pharmacogenetic testing remains unclear. We aim to evaluates the effect of pharmacogenomic testing guiding on clinical outcomes of major depressive disorder.

methodsPubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials were searched from inception until August 2022. Key terms included pharmacogenomic and antidepressive. Odds ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects model for low or moderate heterogeneity or random-effects model for high heterogeneity.

resultsEleven studies (5347 patients) were included. Compared with usual group, pharmacogenomic testing guided group was associated with an increased response rate at week 8 (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.15-1.53, 8 studies, 4328 participants) and week 12 (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.15-1.62, 4 studies, 2814 participants). Similarly, guided group was associated with an increased rate of remission at week 8 (OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.31-1.92, 8 studies, 3971 participants) and week 12 (OR 2.23, 95%CI 1.23-4.04, 5 studies, 2664 participants). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in response rate at week 4 (OR 1.12, 95%CI 0.89-1.41, 2 studies, 2261 participants) and week 24 (OR 1.16, 95%CI 0.96-1.41, 2 studies, 2252 participants), and remission rate at week 4 (OR 1.26, 95%CI 0.93-1.72, 2 studies, 2261 participants) and week 24 (OR 1.06, 95%CI 0.83-1.34, 2 studies, 2252 participants). Medication congruence in 30 days was significantly reduced in the pharmacogenomic guided group compared with the usual care group (OR 2.07, 95%CI 1.69-2.54, 3 studies, 2862 participants). We found significant differences between subgroups of target population in response and remission rate.

conclusionPatients with major depressive disorder may benefit from pharmacogenomic testing guided treatment by achieving target response and remission rates more quickly.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAntidepressive AgentsHumansOdds RatioPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntidepressive AgentsGuidedMajor depressive disorderPharmacogenomic

Identifiers

PMID37173736
PMCPMC10176803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.