SynthesisBMC psychiatry2023
Effect of pharmacogenomics testing guiding on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Depressive disorders: systematic review of approved psychiatric medications (2009-April 2025) and pipeline phase 3 medications.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Comprehensive Characterization of Antidepressant Pharmacogenetics: A Systematic Review of Studies in Major Depressive Disorder.Clinical and translational science · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning approaches in the therapeutic outcome prediction in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Genetic testing in psychiatry, the perceptions of healthcare workers and patients: a mini review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of pharmacogenomic-guided antidepressant prescribing in patients with depression: an umbrella review and updated meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Evidence level for pharmacogenetic testing in antidepressant treatment: a systematic review.PharmacogenomicsPooled it
- Meta-analysis of Response and Remission Outcomes With a Weighted Multigene Pharmacogenomic Test for Adults With Depression.Journal of clinical psychopharmacologyPooled it
- Pharmacogenetic Influence on Stereoselective Steady-State Disposition of Bupropion.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2024Trial
- Roadmap for Mental Health Treatment Utilizing Pharmacogenomic Testing: Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Association between CYP2D6 genotype and treatment effectiveness and safety in 99 hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder a retrospective cohort study CYP2D6 genotype and antidepressant response.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Article
- Large-scale analysis demonstrates the influence of CYP2C19 genotype on specific SSRI side effects.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided dosing in improving treatment outcomes.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Review
- The clinical value of pharmacogenomics in the pharmacotherapy of common psychiatric disorders: a macroscopic analysis based on real-world data.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomic-guided prescribing and polypharmacy across age groups in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a retrospective study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- CYPRI: a clinical decision-making tool to select psychiatric patients for pharmacogenetic testing.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Observational
- The evolving landscape of pharmacogenomics: Current achievements and future directions.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Sertraline safety in adolescents experiencing a depressive episode during first 3 weeks: added anxiolytic matters more than CYP2C19 polymorphisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Risk-managed antidepressant prescribing in primary care mental health: what pharmacogenetics can (and cannot) deliver.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Psychiatric pharmacogenomics: from genetic evidence to clinical integration - structural, educational, and ethical challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Integrating CRISPR functional genomics with admixture-aware psychotropic pharmacogenetics in Brazil.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacogenomic testing guided treatment have been developed to guide drug selection or conversion in major depressive disorder patients. Whether patients benefit from pharmacogenetic testing remains unclear. We aim to evaluates the effect of pharmacogenomic testing guiding on clinical outcomes of major depressive disorder.
methodsPubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials were searched from inception until August 2022. Key terms included pharmacogenomic and antidepressive. Odds ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects model for low or moderate heterogeneity or random-effects model for high heterogeneity.
resultsEleven studies (5347 patients) were included. Compared with usual group, pharmacogenomic testing guided group was associated with an increased response rate at week 8 (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.15-1.53, 8 studies, 4328 participants) and week 12 (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.15-1.62, 4 studies, 2814 participants). Similarly, guided group was associated with an increased rate of remission at week 8 (OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.31-1.92, 8 studies, 3971 participants) and week 12 (OR 2.23, 95%CI 1.23-4.04, 5 studies, 2664 participants). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in response rate at week 4 (OR 1.12, 95%CI 0.89-1.41, 2 studies, 2261 participants) and week 24 (OR 1.16, 95%CI 0.96-1.41, 2 studies, 2252 participants), and remission rate at week 4 (OR 1.26, 95%CI 0.93-1.72, 2 studies, 2261 participants) and week 24 (OR 1.06, 95%CI 0.83-1.34, 2 studies, 2252 participants). Medication congruence in 30 days was significantly reduced in the pharmacogenomic guided group compared with the usual care group (OR 2.07, 95%CI 1.69-2.54, 3 studies, 2862 participants). We found significant differences between subgroups of target population in response and remission rate.
conclusionPatients with major depressive disorder may benefit from pharmacogenomic testing guided treatment by achieving target response and remission rates more quickly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.