Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173669›Full record

ReviewHealth and quality of life outcomes2023

A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool.

Brittany M Woods, Leigh Ann Bray, Sukhkamal Campbell, Aimee Holland, Sylvie Mrug, Sigrid Ladores

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brittany M WoodsUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, 1720 2nd Avenue South, NB482, AL, 35294-1210, Birmingham, USA. brittwoods@uab.edu.
Leigh Ann BrayUniversity of Alabama Capstone College of Nursing, Office 3160, Box 870358, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
Sukhkamal CampbellFertility Preservation Services, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medicine, 1700 6Th Ave South, Women and Infants Center 10390, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Aimee HollandGraduate Clinical Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, 1720 2nd Avenue South, NB 406A, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1210, USA.
Sylvie MrugUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave South, CH415, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA.
Sigrid LadoresUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, 1720 2nd Avenue South, NB422, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze and synthesize the reported psychometric properties of the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) instrument and describe its implications for use in practice and research in men and women with infertility.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed to identify all articles using the FertiQoL tool. PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from September 2006 through May 2022. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported psychometric data on the original FertiQoL tool using a sample population of individuals with infertility. Sample size, country of origin, and psychometric data were documented for each study.

resultsThe initial search revealed 153 articles that had utilized the FertiQoL. Following abstract, title, and full-text screenings, 53 articles reported psychometric data and met criteria for inclusion. The FertiQoL is a sound measurement with satisfactory reliability and validity. Studies indicated adequate reliability in the overall scale ([Formula: see text]), as well as the core Emotional, Mind/Body, Social, and Relational scales ([Formula: see text]) and two optional Tolerability and Environment fertility treatment subscales ([Formula: see text]). Although the Relational subscale exhibited slightly lower reliability in several studies, the internal consistency for the measurement as a whole was satisfactory. Results also indicate adequate: 1) face and content validity with extensive professional and patient feedback during development; 2) convergent validity with general quality of life, depression, and anxiety measurements; and 3) structural validity using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses.

conclusionThe FertiQoL tool is the most commonly used instrument to measure the impact of fertility issues on quality of life in men and women with infertility. Understanding the impact of infertility on quality of life provides valuable insight into the areas of infertility-related care that need to be prioritized, such as mental health or relational stressors. While the instrument has been used in different patient populations with infertility and available in multiple translations, it is necessary to understand the updated psychometric properties and the implications for its use. This review shows that the FertiQoL is reliable and valid for cross-cultural use among individuals with various etiologies of infertility.

Indexed as

InfertilityQuality of LifeFemaleFertilityHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesInfertilityPsychometricsQuality of lifeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37173669
PMCPMC10182698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.