Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173660›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Comprehensive meta-QTL analysis for dissecting the genetic architecture of stripe rust resistance in bread wheat.

Sandeep Kumar, Dinesh Kumar Saini, Farkhandah Jan, Sofora Jan, Mohd Tahir, Ivica Djalovic, Dragana Latkovic, Mohd Anwar Khan, Sundeep Kumar, V K Vikas and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-wide association mapping for the identification of stripe rust resistance loci in US hard winter wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandeep Kumar *Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura, 193201, India.
Dinesh Kumar Saini *Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India.
Farkhandah Jan *Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura, 193201, India.
Sofora JanDivision of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura, 193201, India.
Mohd TahirDivision of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura, 193201, India.
Ivica DjalovicInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Maxim Gorki 30, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Dragana LatkovicDepartment of Field and Vegetable Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Mohd Anwar KhanDivision of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura, 193201, India.
Sundeep KumarIndian Council of Agricultural Research-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
V K VikasICAR-IARI, Regional Station, Wellington, 643 231, The Nilgiris, India.
Upendra KumarDepartment of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology., CCS Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar, India.
Sundip KumarDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, College of Basic Science and Humanities, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263145, U.S. Nagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Narendra Singh DhakaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, G. B. Pant, University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar-263145, U. S. Nagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Om Parkash DhankherSchool of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Stockbridge Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Sachin RustgiDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, 2200 Pocket Road, Florence, SC, 29506, USA.
Reyazul Rouf MirDivision of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura, 193201, India. rrmir@skuastkashmir.ac.in.
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University · INClemson University · USGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology · INInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops · RSNational Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources · INPunjab Agricultural University · INUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYellow or stripe rust, caused by the fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst) is an important disease of wheat that threatens wheat production. Since developing resistant cultivars offers a viable solution for disease management, it is essential to understand the genetic basis of stripe rust resistance. In recent years, meta-QTL analysis of identified QTLs has gained popularity as a way to dissect the genetic architecture underpinning quantitative traits, including disease resistance.

resultsSystematic meta-QTL analysis involving 505 QTLs from 101 linkage-based interval mapping studies was conducted for stripe rust resistance in wheat. For this purpose, publicly available high-quality genetic maps were used to create a consensus linkage map involving 138,574 markers. This map was used to project the QTLs and conduct meta-QTL analysis. A total of 67 important meta-QTLs (MQTLs) were identified which were refined to 29 high-confidence MQTLs. The confidence interval (CI) of MQTLs ranged from 0 to 11.68 cM with a mean of 1.97 cM. The mean physical CI of MQTLs was 24.01 Mb, ranging from 0.0749 to 216.23 Mb per MQTL. As many as 44 MQTLs colocalized with marker-trait associations or SNP peaks associated with stripe rust resistance in wheat. Some MQTLs also included the following major genes- Yr5, Yr7, Yr16, Yr26, Yr30, Yr43, Yr44, Yr64, YrCH52, and YrH52. Candidate gene mining in high-confidence MQTLs identified 1,562 gene models. Examining these gene models for differential expressions yielded 123 differentially expressed genes, including the 59 most promising CGs. We also studied how these genes were expressed in wheat tissues at different phases of development.

conclusionThe most promising MQTLs identified in this study may facilitate marker-assisted breeding for stripe rust resistance in wheat. Information on markers flanking the MQTLs can be utilized in genomic selection models to increase the prediction accuracy for stripe rust resistance. The candidate genes identified can also be utilized for enhancing the wheat resistance against stripe rust after in vivo confirmation/validation using one or more of the following methods: gene cloning, reverse genetic methods, and omics approaches.

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaTriticumBreadChromosome MappingDisease ResistancePlant BreedingPlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociCandidate genesConsensus mapMeta-analysisMQTLStripe rust

Identifiers

PMID37173660
PMCPMC10182688
OpenAlexW4376631035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.