Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173652›Full record

ReviewBMC pediatrics2023

Implementing an exclusive human milk diet for preterm infants: real-world experience in diverse NICUs.

Jonathan R Swanson, Amy Becker, Jenny Fox, Michael Horgan, Russell Moores, John Pardalos, Joaquim Pinheiro, Dan Stewart, Tonya Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. The role of QI collaboratives in neonatology.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan R SwansonUniversity of Virginia Children's Hospital, Charlottesville, VA, USA. JRS3YC@uvahealth.org.
Amy BeckerShady Grove Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jenny FoxChildren's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Michael HorganDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Bernard & Millie Duker Children's Hospital, Albany, NY, USA.
Russell MooresChildren's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
John PardalosUniversity of Missouri Health Care-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA.
Joaquim PinheiroAlbany Medical Center, Bernard & Millie Duker Children's Hospital, Albany, NY, USA.
Dan StewartNorton Children's Hospital and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Tonya RobinsonUniversity of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USAdventist HealthCare Shady Grove Medical Center · USChildren's Hospital of Richmond at VCU · USKosair Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Louisville Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri Health System · USUniversity of Virginia Children's Hospital · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman milk-based human milk fortifier (HMB-HMF) makes it possible to provide an exclusive human milk diet (EHMD) to very low birth weight (VLBW) infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Before the introduction of HMB-HMF in 2006, NICUs relied on bovine milk-based human milk fortifiers (BMB-HMFs) when mother's own milk (MOM) or pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) could not provide adequate nutrition. Despite evidence supporting the clinical benefits of an EHMD (such as reducing the frequency of morbidities), barriers prevent its widespread adoption, including limited health economics and outcomes data, cost concerns, and lack of standardized feeding guidelines.

methodsNine experts from seven institutions gathered for a virtual roundtable discussion in October 2020 to discuss the benefits and challenges to implementing an EHMD program in the NICU environment. Each center provided a review of the process of starting their program and also presented data on various neonatal and financial metrics associated with the program. Data gathered were either from their own Vermont Oxford Network outcomes or an institutional clinical database. As each center utilizes their EHMD program in slightly different populations and over different time periods, data presented was center-specific. After all presentations, the experts discussed issues within the field of neonatology that need to be addressed with regards to the utilization of an EHMD in the NICU population.

resultsImplementation of an EHMD program faces many barriers, no matter the NICU size, patient population or geographic location. Successful implementation requires a team approach (including finance and IT support) with a NICU champion. Having pre-specified target populations as well as data tracking is also helpful. Real-world experiences of NICUs with established EHMD programs show reductions in comorbidities, regardless of the institution's size or level of care. EHMD programs also proved to be cost effective. For the NICUs that had necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) data available, EHMD programs resulted in either a decrease or change in total (medical + surgical) NEC rate and reductions in surgical NEC. Institutions that provided cost and complications data all reported a substantial cost avoidance after EHMD implementation, ranging between $515,113 and $3,369,515 annually per institution.

conclusionsThe data provided support the initiation of EHMD programs in NICUs for very preterm infants, but there are still methodologic issues to be addressed so that guidelines can be created and all NICUs, regardless of size, can provide standardized care that benefits VLBW infants.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingMilk, HumanDietHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalAdvocacyCostExclusive human milk dietGrowthHuman milk fortifierImplementationNecrotizing enterocolitisNICUPreterm birthPublic policy

Identifiers

PMID37173652
PMCPMC10176849
OpenAlexW4376278222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.