Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173584›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2023

Network Hyperexcitability in Early Alzheimer's Disease: Is Functional Connectivity a Potential Biomarker?

C J Stam, A M van Nifterick, W de Haan, A A Gouw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C J StamDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Vrij Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. CJ.Stam@Amsterdamumc.nl.
A M van NifterickDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Vrij Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W de HaanDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Vrij Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A A GouwDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Vrij Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network hyperexcitability (NH) is an important feature of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease. Functional connectivity (FC) of brain networks has been proposed as a potential biomarker for NH. Here we use a whole brain computational model and resting-state MEG recordings to investigate the relation between hyperexcitability and FC. Oscillatory brain activity was simulated with a Stuart Landau model on a network of 78 interconnected brain regions. FC was quantified with amplitude envelope correlation (AEC) and phase coherence (PC). MEG was recorded in 18 subjects with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and 18 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Functional connectivity was determined with the corrected AECc and phase lag index (PLI), in the 4-8 Hz and the 8-13 Hz bands. The excitation/inhibition balance in the model had a strong effect on both AEC and PC. This effect was different for AEC and PC, and was influenced by structural coupling strength and frequency band. Empirical FC matrices of SCD and MCI showed a good correlation with model FC for AEC, but less so for PC. For AEC the fit was best in the hyperexcitable range. We conclude that FC is sensitive to changes in E/I balance. The AEC was more sensitive than the PLI, and results were better for the thetaband than the alpha band. This conclusion was supported by fitting the model to empirical data. Our study justifies the use of functional connectivity measures as surrogate markers for E/I balance.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBrainHumansAlzheimer’s diseaseBrain networksComputational modelEEGE/I balanceFunctional connectivityMEGMild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID37173584
PMCPMC10293463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.