ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2023
Occipital artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery bypass: a cadaveric feasibility study.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- CTA-based classification of occipital artery course variations at the atlanto-occipital interval, with surgical implications.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Observational
- Choice of Treatment Modality and Validity of Direct Surgery for Complex Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery-Related Aneurysms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo demonstrate that occipital artery (OA)-p1 posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) bypass can be an alternative for complex posterior circulation aneurysms.
methodsA far-lateral approach to craniotomy was performed on 20 cadaveric specimens, and the OA was obtained 'in-line.' Its length, diameter, and the number of p1/p2 and p3 segmental perforators were determined, and the relationship between the caudal loop and cerebellar tonsil position was also assessed. The distance between the PICA's origin and the cranial nerve XI (CN XI), the buffer length above the CN XI after dissection, the OA length required to complete the OA-p1/p3 PICA bypass, and the p1 and p3 segment diameters were all measured. A bypass training practical scale (TSIO) was used to evaluate the quality of the anastomosis.
resultsAll specimens underwent OA-p1 PICA end-to-end bypass and had favorable results for the TSIO score, 15 sides underwent OA-p3 PICA end-to-side bypass, and the other bypass protocols were less common. The buffer length above the CN XI after dissection, the distance between the PICA's origin and the CN XI, and the first perforator were all of sufficient length. The direct length of the OA needed to complete the OA-p1 PICA end-to-end bypass was significantly less than the available length and the OA-p3 PICA end-to-side bypass, with the OA matching the p1 segment diameter. The number of p1 perforators was less than that of p3, and the OA diameter was equal to that of the p1 segment.
conclusionOA-p1 PICA end-to-end bypass is a feasible alternative in cases in which p3 segment has high caudal loops or anatomic anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.