Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173523›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2023

Annotating and prioritizing human non-coding variants with RegulomeDB v.2.

Shengcheng Dong, Nanxiang Zhao, Emma Spragins, Meenakshi S Kagda, Mingjie Li, Pedro Assis, Otto Jolanki, Yunhai Luo, J Michael Cherry, Alan P Boyle and 1 more

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shengcheng Dong *Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nanxiang Zhao *Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3124-0958
Emma SpraginsDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Meenakshi S KagdaDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0545-0185
Mingjie LiDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Pedro AssisDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-0677
Otto JolankiDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-4849
Yunhai LuoDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Michael CherryDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-5180
Alan P BoyleDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. apboyle@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-1105
Benjamin C HitzDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. hitz@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3361-3594

Funding

RegulomeDB: A Resource for the Human RegulomeU24HG009293 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOYLE, ALAN P, CHERRY, J. MICHAEL · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG009293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID37173523
PMCPMC10989417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.