Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173518›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2023

Deafness: from genetic architecture to gene therapy.

Christine Petit, Crystel Bonnet, Saaïd Safieddine

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic and functional evidence implicates amedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rapid cochlear gene therapy in adult deaf mice:Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine PetitInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Institut de l'Audition, F-75012, Paris, France. christine.petit@pasteur.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-002X
Crystel BonnetInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Institut de l'Audition, F-75012, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1916-9119
Saaïd SafieddineInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Institut de l'Audition, F-75012, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6159-0572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in deciphering the genetic architecture of human sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI) or loss, and multidisciplinary studies of mouse models, have led to the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying auditory system function, primarily in the cochlea, the mammalian hearing organ. These studies have provided unparalleled insights into the pathophysiological processes involved in SNHI, paving the way for the development of inner-ear gene therapy based on gene replacement, gene augmentation or gene editing. The application of these approaches in preclinical studies over the past decade has highlighted key translational opportunities and challenges for achieving effective, safe and sustained inner-ear gene therapy to prevent or cure monogenic forms of SNHI and associated balance disorders.

Indexed as

DeafnessHearing Loss, SensorineuralAnimalsGene EditingGenetic TherapyHearingHumansMammalsMice

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.