Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173512›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2023

Long-term safety and maintenance of response with esketamine nasal spray in participants with treatment-resistant depression: interim results of the SUSTAIN-3 study.

Naim Zaki, Li Nancy Chen, Rosanne Lane, Teodora Doherty, Wayne C Drevets, Randall L Morrison, Gerard Sanacora, Samuel T Wilkinson, Vanina Popova, Dong-Jing Fu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07120477 (Esketamine Versus Crisis Response Planning Versus Enhanced Treatment as Usual for Suicide Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07120477 phase4suspendednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Esketamine Versus Crisis Response Planning Versus Enhanced Treatment as Usual for Suicide Prevention: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial in a Brazilian Municipality (SAVE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2026 to 2029Enrolled468ConditionsSuicide Prevention, Ketamine, Crisis Response PlanArmsIntravenous Esketamine, Crisis Response Planning intervention (structures safety planning)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Treatment-resistant Depression in the Post-ketamine Era: Unmet Needs beyond Rapid Response.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Rapid-acting NMDA and GABAergic Modulators in Mood Disorders: From Synaptic Mechanisms to Clinical Practice.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  19. Esketamine in depression: putative biomarkers from clinical research.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  20. Esketamine use in real-world clinical practice in patients with treatment-resistant depression.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naim ZakiDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA. nzaki@its.jnj.com.
Li Nancy ChenDepartment of Clinical Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Rosanne LaneDepartment of Clinical Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Teodora DohertyDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Wayne C DrevetsDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, CA, USA.
Randall L MorrisonDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Gerard SanacoraDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3722-8829
Samuel T WilkinsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Vanina PopovaDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development Belgium, Beerse, Belgium.
Dong-Jing FuDepartment of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USJanssen (Belgium) · BEYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have higher rates of relapse and pronounced decreases in daily functioning and health-related quality of life compared to patients with major depressive disorder who are not treatment-resistant, underscoring the need for treatment choices with sustained efficacy and long-term tolerability. Adults with TRD who participated in ≥1 of 6 phase 3 "parent" studies could continue esketamine treatment, combined with an oral antidepressant, by enrolling in phase 3, open-label, long-term extension study, SUSTAIN-3. Based on their status at parent-study end, eligible participants entered a 4-week induction phase followed by an optimization/maintenance phase, or directly entered the optimization/maintenance phase of SUSTAIN-3. Intranasal esketamine dosing was flexible, twice-weekly during induction and individualized to depression severity during optimization/maintenance. At the interim data cutoff (01 December 2020), 1148 participants were enrolled, 458 at induction and 690 at optimization/maintenance. Mean (median) cumulative duration of maintenance esketamine treatment was 31.5 (37.7) months (totaling 2769 cumulative patient-years). Common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥20%) were headache, dizziness, nausea, dissociation, somnolence, and nasopharyngitis. Mean Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score decreased during induction, and this reduction persisted during optimization/maintenance (mean [SD] change from the baseline to the endpoint of each phase: induction -12.8 [9.73]; optimization/maintenance +1.1 [9.93]), with 35.6% and 46.1% of participants in remission (MADRS total score ≤12) at induction and optimization/maintenance endpoints, respectively. Improvement in depression ratings generally persisted among participants who remained in maintenance treatment, and no new safety signal was identified during long-term treatment (up to 4.5 years) using intermittent-dosed esketamine in conjunction with daily antidepressant.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantMajor Depressive DisorderAdultAntidepressive AgentsDepressionDouble-Blind MethodHumansKetamineNasal SpraysQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsEsketamineKetamineNasal Sprays

Identifiers

PMID37173512
PMCPMC10267177
OpenAlexW4376274076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.